Re: [Spirit-general] Problems compiling example bind.cpp

[Joel de G. <jo...@bo...>]

eb...@sa... wrote:

>>Go for it! Unless someone objects, I think it is a good idea to  
>>have a minimal set of examples bundled with a product, but should  
>>work out of the box. Also, this is the last semi-major hurdle  
>>which keeps us from releasing 1.8.1.  
> 
>   
> What are the minimum capabilities that are to be shipped  with the  
> distribution?  As you mentioned, bind is one not added to miniboost.  Are  
> there any others?  How about boost/cstdlib.h?  

I guess, just enough to get all the samples and tests compiling
and running.

-- 
Joel de Guzman
http://www.boost-consulting.com
http://spirit.sf.net