Re: [spi-devel-general] SPI

[Vitaly W. <vw...@ru...>]

David Brownell wrote:

>On Monday 21 November 2005 10:44 pm, Greg KH wrote:
>  
>
>>On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 10:17:48AM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>But I agree that this issue is worth trying to close.  I'd be interested
>>>in any comments from Andrew or Greg, but probably LKML is the best place
>>>to have technical discussions related to "which framework".
>>>      
>>>
>>I was hoping that you all would work together to hash out a framework
>>that everyone agreed on.  That way the decision would be easy :)
>>    
>>
>
>Me too, but it's felt like "the everyone agrees" step has a few holdouts
>with more invested in their own approach than in achieving consensus or
>in addressing various technical issues that have been raised repeatedly.
>  
>
I'm afraid that our understanding of the word "consensus" differs.
Have to point out also that I haven't seen adequate answers on the 
"various thechnical issues" raised by Dmitry or me.

Vitaly