Re: [spi-devel-general] SPI

[David B. <da...@pa...>]

On Monday 21 November 2005 10:44 pm, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 10:17:48AM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> > But I agree that this issue is worth trying to close.  I'd be interested
> > in any comments from Andrew or Greg, but probably LKML is the best place
> > to have technical discussions related to "which framework".
> 
> I was hoping that you all would work together to hash out a framework
> that everyone agreed on.  That way the decision would be easy :)

Me too, but it's felt like "the everyone agrees" step has a few holdouts
with more invested in their own approach than in achieving consensus or
in addressing various technical issues that have been raised repeatedly.

I'm not sure I'll want to spend too much more time pushing on this, given
that degree of non-cooperation.  Unless that changes, I think the only
way to get an SPI framework into kernel.org code would be someone just
deciding between one of the (two?) alternatives.

- Dave