Re: [Spglib-users] primitive atom consistency
Brought to you by:
atztogo
From: Atsushi T. <atz...@gm...> - 2018-10-31 00:54:26
|
Currently yes, the code is written so. Do you recommend me to guarantee this for the future? Togo On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 2:23 AM Noam Bernstein <noa...@nr...> wrote: > > Hi - I have a question about finding the primitive cell/atoms from a supercell. Is it supposed to be guaranteed that (with the python interface) find_primitive returns indices that are consistent with the mapping_to_primitive entry returned by get_symmetry_dataset? I.e. if get_symmetry_dataset(at)[“mapping_to_primitive”] is 0 for an atom, does that guarantee that it matches the first entry in the items returned from find_primitive? > > Noam > > > > _______________________________________________ > Spglib-users mailing list > Spg...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spglib-users -- Atsushi Togo Elements Strategy Initiative for Structural Materials, Kyoto university E-mail: atz...@gm... |