Re: [Spglib-users] A comparison of FINDSYM and Spglib symmetry finders
Brought to you by:
atztogo
From: Evgeny B. <ja...@ya...> - 2012-08-15 08:26:49
|
Dear Dr. Togo san, I have figured out the reasons of my mismatches. They were non-tuned accuracies and skipping of magnetic moments (in my Spglib wrapper test class, in particular), exactly as i thought. I noted that you have a function spg_get_symmetry_with_collinear_spin in Spglib C API, which is inaccessible from python extension. Now I removed magmoms consideration (comparing only the "pure structural space groups") and made 1e-04 accuracy for both programs. And so the new results do not contain any group numbers mismatching at all. There are still some cases where group settings do not match though. Most of them belong to orthorhombic space groups (the most frequent case in my tests was Pnma / Pbnm, the cyclic transposition of basic translation vectors a, b, c to c, a, b with Wyckoff position change c(z, x, 1/4) to d(z, x, y), an example can be found in spglib tests folder). Regards, Evgeny Blokhin |