From: Sebastian C. <sca...@po...> - 2009-04-22 21:01:25
|
Hi Daniel, > Only think I can think of is to test to make sure 0.2 can be called via > a symbolic link - I think 0.1 made some path assumptions. that should work without any problems. We just substituted the path assumption thing :) > I also have the quick-and-dirty packaging patch in > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2132740&group_id=230162&atid=1079429 > , but I think it's fine keeping that separate if people don't want to > integrate it for whatever reason. Maybe we can support already built deb and rpm binaries starting with version 0.3. If you want to do this packaging thing you are very welcome :) best regards, Sebastian |