Re: [Sparql4j-devel] 1st draft of use cases, requirements and design committed to cvs

[Janne S. <jan...@pr...>]

> You're right - email would be best for discussion of the document.

Let me switch to email from the word doc for a while.

1. I would now agree that let's not override the existing semantics of 
the execute() method i.e. let's manage boolean return values via 
ResultSet with 1 single row.

2. In order to make work proceed step-by-step, should we define the 
development via milestones where M1 would include boolean results as 
well as result sets but not graphs. M2, once planned later, would then 
include graphs, too. We have some use cases for their eventual inclusion 
but in order to validate sparql protocol practical aspects we could 
target M1 first.

Your remark on the timezone was a good one - what I don't know (yet) is 
whether the javax.xml.datatypes could be returned from getTimestamp() 
methods (i.e. do these types inherit any of the java basic data types) 
or if we need a method signature?

Janne
-- 
Janne Saarela <janne.saarela at profium.com>
Profium, Lars Sonckin kaari 12, 02600 Espoo, Finland
Internet: http://www.profium.com