sourcejammer-devel

Re: [SourceJammer-devel] Beta 2.1.2 problems

[Robert M. <rob...@ya...>]

I had similar problems. 

Timo, as I thought about this feature more, I thought a better configuration approach might be to
have a checkbox instead of a text box for entering a file path.

Check the box to store files "externally". Don't check the box to store files in the local folder.
And I don't think we need to offer options of where to store the files. I think we can just pick a
logical location and stick with it. [user folder]/.sourcejammer seems like a pretty good place,
though I realize that this is inconsistent with other files the client stores. Probably we should
store the [username].[archive] files in there as well, but let's not worry about that for this
release.

--Rob


--- Marc Palmer <ma...@an...> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'm trying it out... and I cleared the "external path for .source.jam" 
> setting and now I can't get any files an have SJ actually think I have 
> the latest version, it always shows them out of date.
> 
> How do you make SJ 2.1.2 work the way it used to?!
> 
> Also, I changed the setting to blank, exitted SJ, ran it again and magic 
> - the .\sourcejammer.projectinfo setting is back!
> 
> Cheers
> 
> 
> -- 
> Marc Palmer    wj...@wa...
> 			
> Wangjammers - Java, J2ME and Web Consultants
>    ~ http://www.wangjammers.org/
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> SourceJammer-devel mailing list
> Sou...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sourcejammer-devel
> 


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/ 

Re: [SourceJammer-devel] Beta 2.1.2 problems

[Timo H. <tim...@ya...>]

Rob,

i will change the behavior like you suggested. The users home directory seems
to be ok for me. I hope i will fix the problem the next two days.

Any other problems with the new release so far?

Timo

--- Robert MacGrogan <rob...@ya...> wrote:
> I had similar problems. 
> 
> Timo, as I thought about this feature more, I thought a better configuration
> approach might be to
> have a checkbox instead of a text box for entering a file path.
> 
> Check the box to store files "externally". Don't check the box to store files
> in the local folder.
> And I don't think we need to offer options of where to store the files. I
> think we can just pick a
> logical location and stick with it. [user folder]/.sourcejammer seems like a
> pretty good place,
> though I realize that this is inconsistent with other files the client
> stores. Probably we should
> store the [username].[archive] files in there as well, but let's not worry
> about that for this
> release.
> 
> --Rob
> 
> 
> --- Marc Palmer <ma...@an...> wrote:
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I'm trying it out... and I cleared the "external path for .source.jam" 
> > setting and now I can't get any files an have SJ actually think I have 
> > the latest version, it always shows them out of date.
> > 
> > How do you make SJ 2.1.2 work the way it used to?!
> > 
> > Also, I changed the setting to blank, exitted SJ, ran it again and magic 
> > - the .\sourcejammer.projectinfo setting is back!
> > 
> > Cheers
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Marc Palmer    wj...@wa...
> > 			
> > Wangjammers - Java, J2ME and Web Consultants
> >    ~ http://www.wangjammers.org/
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> > _______________________________________________
> > SourceJammer-devel mailing list
> > Sou...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sourcejammer-devel
> > 
> 
> 
> 		
> __________________________________ 
> Do you Yahoo!? 
> Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
> http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/ 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> SourceJammer-devel mailing list
> Sou...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sourcejammer-devel
> 


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/ 

Re: [SourceJammer-devel] Beta 2.1.2 problems

[Robert M. <rob...@ya...>]

I haven't noticed anything else except for the Windows LAF problem Albert also mentioned. But I
have not tested it all tha tmuch yet. I want to test the new client by using it for my regular SJ
client, but I don't feel comfortable doing that until the .source.jam issue is resolved.

Thanks.

--Rob



--- Timo Haberkern <tim...@ya...> wrote:
> Rob,
> 
> i will change the behavior like you suggested. The users home directory seems
> to be ok for me. I hope i will fix the problem the next two days.
> 
> Any other problems with the new release so far?
> 
> Timo
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Re: [SourceJammer-devel] Beta 2.1.2 problems

[Marc P. <ma...@an...>]

Robert MacGrogan wrote:
> I haven't noticed anything else except for the Windows LAF problem Albert also mentioned. But I
> have not tested it all tha tmuch yet. I want to test the new client by using it for my regular SJ
> client, but I don't feel comfortable doing that until the .source.jam issue is resolved.

There is a LAF that completely screws up under Windows... I think it was 
one beginning with "M"... you can't see popup list boxes (they only 
render the portion under the mouse if you move the mouse).

I think any faulty LAF should be excluded from the list, as this is 
probably not anything related to SJ code.

Timo - will you be putting in a checkbox for the ".source.jam external 
directory" option and setting it to OFF by default as per Robert's 
suggestion? I second this, as the current mechanism is very confusing. I 
haven't been able to get 2.1.2 working properly at all yet as a result 
of this.

Cheers

-- 
Marc Palmer    wj...@wa...
			
Wangjammers - Java, J2ME and Web Consultants
   ~ http://www.wangjammers.org/

Re: [SourceJammer-devel] Beta 2.1.2 problems

[Albert M. <amo...@ev...>]

No screwing to me with any M-whatever L&F, all four (Metouia, Metal, Modern and
MacOS) run fine. So it seems that they work randomly on different machines, or
perhaps I have not been able to find the popup that breaks down.

Is there any planning to improve the tree view of the shares and branches of a
file? Well, I'll search the issue tracker and add it if none exists. It's a
visual feature that will help the usage of that tab of the details dialog, and I
think Timo could find a very nice way to display it. Well, sorry to assign you
work, but so far most of your production has been very cool.

BTW, I love the vertical bar with the visual index of changes in the diff tool!

Cheers,
Albert.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Marc Palmer" <ma...@an...>
To: <sou...@li...>
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 11:11 AM
Subject: Re: [SourceJammer-devel] Beta 2.1.2 problems


> Robert MacGrogan wrote:
> > I haven't noticed anything else except for the Windows LAF problem Albert
also mentioned. But I
> > have not tested it all tha tmuch yet. I want to test the new client by using
it for my regular SJ
> > client, but I don't feel comfortable doing that until the .source.jam issue
is resolved.
>
> There is a LAF that completely screws up under Windows... I think it was
> one beginning with "M"... you can't see popup list boxes (they only
> render the portion under the mouse if you move the mouse).
>
> I think any faulty LAF should be excluded from the list, as this is
> probably not anything related to SJ code.
>
> Timo - will you be putting in a checkbox for the ".source.jam external
> directory" option and setting it to OFF by default as per Robert's
> suggestion? I second this, as the current mechanism is very confusing. I
> haven't been able to get 2.1.2 working properly at all yet as a result
> of this.
>
> Cheers
>
> --
> Marc Palmer    wj...@wa...
>
> Wangjammers - Java, J2ME and Web Consultants
>    ~ http://www.wangjammers.org/
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> SourceJammer-devel mailing list
> Sou...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sourcejammer-devel
>

Re: [SourceJammer-devel] Beta 2.1.2 problems

[Timo H. <tim...@ya...>]

Hmm, never had this Problem with Metuia. What plattform do you running the
client (OS, Java VM)?? Metouia isn't developed for a long time and the project
seems dead.

And we have many problems with all SkinLF based L&Fs (Modern...) Maybe we
should shrink the list of possible L&Fs to the really useable ones like Marc
suggested.

+1 from me for doing so.

Timo

--- Marc Palmer <ma...@an...> wrote:
> Robert MacGrogan wrote:
> > I haven't noticed anything else except for the Windows LAF problem Albert
> also mentioned. But I
> > have not tested it all tha tmuch yet. I want to test the new client by
> using it for my regular SJ
> > client, but I don't feel comfortable doing that until the .source.jam issue
> is resolved.
> 
> There is a LAF that completely screws up under Windows... I think it was 
> one beginning with "M"... you can't see popup list boxes (they only 
> render the portion under the mouse if you move the mouse).
> 
> I think any faulty LAF should be excluded from the list, as this is 
> probably not anything related to SJ code.
> 
> Timo - will you be putting in a checkbox for the ".source.jam external 
> directory" option and setting it to OFF by default as per Robert's 
> suggestion? I second this, as the current mechanism is very confusing. I 
> haven't been able to get 2.1.2 working properly at all yet as a result 
> of this.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> -- 
> Marc Palmer    wj...@wa...
> 			
> Wangjammers - Java, J2ME and Web Consultants
>    ~ http://www.wangjammers.org/
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> SourceJammer-devel mailing list
> Sou...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sourcejammer-devel
> 


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/ 

Re: [SourceJammer-devel] Beta 2.1.2 problems

[Marc P. <ma...@an...>]

Timo Haberkern wrote:
> Hmm, never had this Problem with Metuia. What plattform do you running the
> client (OS, Java VM)?? Metouia isn't developed for a long time and the project
> seems dead.

Windows XP SP1, Sun JDK 1.4.1_01


Cheers

-- 
Marc Palmer    wj...@wa...
			
Wangjammers - Java, J2ME and Web Consultants
   ~ http://www.wangjammers.org/

Re: [SourceJammer-devel] Beta 2.1.2 problems

[Timo H. <tim...@ya...>]

I only have the Windows L&F Problem at the and hope to fix it till tommorow.

> Is there any planning to improve the tree view of the shares and branches of
> a
> file? Well, I'll search the issue tracker and add it if none exists. It's a
> visual feature that will help the usage of that tab of the details dialog,
> and I
> think Timo could find a very nice way to display it. Well, sorry to assign
> you
> work, but so far most of your production has been very cool.
Hah. In Germany we say: Give them your small finger and they take the complete
hand ;-) Let's how we assign tasks for 2.2 development branch...

> BTW, I love the vertical bar with the visual index of changes in the diff
> tool!
Thanks :-) 

--- Albert Moliner <amo...@ev...> wrote:
> 
> No screwing to me with any M-whatever L&F, all four (Metouia, Metal, Modern
> and
> MacOS) run fine. So it seems that they work randomly on different machines,
> or
> perhaps I have not been able to find the popup that breaks down.
> 
> Is there any planning to improve the tree view of the shares and branches of
> a
> file? Well, I'll search the issue tracker and add it if none exists. It's a
> visual feature that will help the usage of that tab of the details dialog,
> and I
> think Timo could find a very nice way to display it. Well, sorry to assign
> you
> work, but so far most of your production has been very cool.
> 
> BTW, I love the vertical bar with the visual index of changes in the diff
> tool!
> 
> Cheers,
> Albert.
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Marc Palmer" <ma...@an...>
> To: <sou...@li...>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 11:11 AM
> Subject: Re: [SourceJammer-devel] Beta 2.1.2 problems
> 
> 
> > Robert MacGrogan wrote:
> > > I haven't noticed anything else except for the Windows LAF problem Albert
> also mentioned. But I
> > > have not tested it all tha tmuch yet. I want to test the new client by
> using
> it for my regular SJ
> > > client, but I don't feel comfortable doing that until the .source.jam
> issue
> is resolved.
> >
> > There is a LAF that completely screws up under Windows... I think it was
> > one beginning with "M"... you can't see popup list boxes (they only
> > render the portion under the mouse if you move the mouse).
> >
> > I think any faulty LAF should be excluded from the list, as this is
> > probably not anything related to SJ code.
> >
> > Timo - will you be putting in a checkbox for the ".source.jam external
> > directory" option and setting it to OFF by default as per Robert's
> > suggestion? I second this, as the current mechanism is very confusing. I
> > haven't been able to get 2.1.2 working properly at all yet as a result
> > of this.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > --
> > Marc Palmer    wj...@wa...
> >
> > Wangjammers - Java, J2ME and Web Consultants
> >    ~ http://www.wangjammers.org/
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> > _______________________________________________
> > SourceJammer-devel mailing list
> > Sou...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sourcejammer-devel
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> SourceJammer-devel mailing list
> Sou...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sourcejammer-devel
> 


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/ 

Re: [SourceJammer-devel] Beta 2.1.2 problems

[Robert M. <rob...@ya...>]

>>Well, sorry to assign
> > you
> > work, but so far most of your production has been very cool.
> Hah. In Germany we say: Give them your small finger and they take the complete
> hand ;-) Let's how we assign tasks for 2.2 development branch...

I English, I guess we'd say "Give 'em an inch and they take a mile."

I do think that Timo is right that any new requests can wait till 2.2.

> 
> > BTW, I love the vertical bar with the visual index of changes in the diff
> > tool!

I second that. The new diff viewer is very cool.

Re: Metouia: It's not causing any problems for me either. But I don't really care if we drop it
from the list either.

I have an additional bug to report as well. There don't seem to be new icons for shared files
(either text or binary). 

--Rob





		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Make Yahoo! your home page 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

Re: [SourceJammer-devel] Beta 2.1.2 problems

[Albert M. <amo...@ev...>]

"You give them your hand and they take all of your arm" is the Spanish version
:-D
Isn't it funny that every language has an expression for it? It seems there are
scrounging people all over the world! *laugh*

Anyway, it has not been me who has assigned the issue to you. Mine was just a
cheeky proposal, but Robert has set you as the responsible at phpBugTracker, all
complains to him! ;-)

I agree, though, that all these new improvements should be tackled in the 2.2
version. 2.1 ought to be limitted now to bug resolving.

Cheers,
Albert.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert MacGrogan" <rob...@ya...>
To: <sou...@li...>
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 5:06 PM
Subject: Re: [SourceJammer-devel] Beta 2.1.2 problems


> >>Well, sorry to assign
> > > you
> > > work, but so far most of your production has been very cool.
> > Hah. In Germany we say: Give them your small finger and they take the
complete
> > hand ;-) Let's how we assign tasks for 2.2 development branch...
>
> I English, I guess we'd say "Give 'em an inch and they take a mile."
>
> I do think that Timo is right that any new requests can wait till 2.2.
>
> >
> > > BTW, I love the vertical bar with the visual index of changes in the diff
> > > tool!
>
> I second that. The new diff viewer is very cool.
>
> Re: Metouia: It's not causing any problems for me either. But I don't really
care if we drop it
> from the list either.
>
> I have an additional bug to report as well. There don't seem to be new icons
for shared files
> (either text or binary).
>
> --Rob
>
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Make Yahoo! your home page
> http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> SourceJammer-devel mailing list
> Sou...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sourcejammer-devel
>

Re: [SourceJammer-devel] Beta 2.1.2 problems

[Timo H. <tim...@ya...>]

Rob,

i hope i will be able to solve that problem tommorow. I'm i little bit under
stress at the moment.

Timo

--- Robert MacGrogan <rob...@ya...> wrote:
> I haven't noticed anything else except for the Windows LAF problem Albert
> also mentioned. But I
> have not tested it all tha tmuch yet. I want to test the new client by using
> it for my regular SJ
> client, but I don't feel comfortable doing that until the .source.jam issue
> is resolved.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> --Rob
> 
> 
> 
> --- Timo Haberkern <tim...@ya...> wrote:
> > Rob,
> > 
> > i will change the behavior like you suggested. The users home directory
> seems
> > to be ok for me. I hope i will fix the problem the next two days.
> > 
> > Any other problems with the new release so far?
> > 
> > Timo
> > 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> SourceJammer-devel mailing list
> Sou...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sourcejammer-devel
> 


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses. 
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail