[SourceJammer-users] Re: SourceJammer
Brought to you by:
robertmacgrogan
From: Robert M. <rob...@ya...> - 2002-02-26 02:45:02
|
Hi, Abraham. Excellent work on the documentation. Thanks a lot for doing that. If you could take the time to "genericize" that doc and possibly add a section on how to add a new archive, that would be truly excellent. If not, I can definitely work with what you've got. One thing a lot of people seem to get confused about is the relationship between an archive on the server (Tools|Make Archive) and the archive info stored on your local computer (Connection|Maintain Archive List). Anything you could write (or suggest to me) to clear that up would be great. As for joing SourceForge, it's easy. Just go to sourceforge.net and open an account. If you have time to contribute to the gui, that would be great. If you just want to see what makes it tick and mess around with it for your own purposes, you are welcome to do that by downloading the source code. I've remove the link to your doc in case you did not want the address published here. I will copy the doc and put it into my own SourceJammer archive. By the way, a couple of comments: That recursive misspelling (resursive) is pretty funny. I must've looked at that a million times without noticing it. I'll try to get in a fix for 1.1.0. Selecting the wrong file type when you add a file (text for a binary file or vice versa) will not result in garbled files being returned from SourceJammer if you select binary for a text file. I've never tried storing a binary file as text, so I have not idea what might happen if you did that. SJ will happily overwrite a file on your local machine that does not match the version it is downloading as long as that file is flagged as read-only. This may seem counter-intuitive, but SJ assumes that someone is working on a file that is writable and is not working on one set to read-only (since it sets files to read-only when it checks them in or does a get and only sets files to writable when it checks them out). If you try to get a file and you have a local version of that file that is writable, you'll get a dialog asking you if you want to overwrite the file. This behavior should be completely consistent. Anyway, thanks for your contribution. And thanks for using SJ. --Rob --- Abraham Fowler <ab...@fo...> wrote: > Hello, > > I would just like to tell you that we have been > using your SourceJammer > project for our team project in a graduate-level > software engineering > course, and we like the project. I would especially > like to have the > privilege of perhaps tinkering around with some of > the code, > particularly the GUI code. I am new to SourceForge, > perhaps you could > give me some pointers as to how to get started > there? > > Another item: You mention on your site that you > don't have end-user > docs, so I went ahead and created a simple tutorial > for our team's > internal use. If you would like to check it out, it > is at > <snip> > It may not be there > for long after the spring semester of 2002, however. > If you would like > to take this tutorial as a starting point and > customize it yourself, > feel free to do so. In fact, if you would like, I'd > be willing to > donate a few hours to help out on the end-user docs. > I am busy too, so > I can't guarantee too much, but I am interested in > the project enough > that I think I could find some time. > > Thanks for your work, and keep it up! > > Abraham Fowler > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games http://sports.yahoo.com |