Re: [SourceJammer-users] Class Not Found: QueueLogger

[Michael C. <me...@in...>]

Robert MacGrogan wrote:

 > I've only read a little about XML-RPC and from what I know about
 > it, it seems very similar to SOAP. It involves serializing objects
 > in a standard way to XML documents and transports these documents
 > using HTTP. What the big differences are, I don't know. If you have
 > a strong reason for prefering XML-RPC to SOAP, I would like to hear
 > it.

XML-RPC is, in a nutshell, much simpler.  Whether this is a good thing
or a bad thing depends on your needs:

http://weblog.masukomi.org/writings/xml-rpc_vs_soap.htm

 > Perhaps one idea would be to provide plugins for SJ to support either
 > protocol . . .

I actually thought that XML-RPC would be fairly ideal for SourceJammer.
Since it's already been implemented with SOAP, though, there isn't
really much need for it to support XML-RPC as well.  How many different
XML-based remote-procedure-calling/object-brokering protocols does one
need in one piece of software?

_________________
mike