Re: [SourceJammer-devel] Beta 2.1.2 problems

[Robert M. <rob...@ya...>]

I had similar problems. 

Timo, as I thought about this feature more, I thought a better configuration approach might be to
have a checkbox instead of a text box for entering a file path.

Check the box to store files "externally". Don't check the box to store files in the local folder.
And I don't think we need to offer options of where to store the files. I think we can just pick a
logical location and stick with it. [user folder]/.sourcejammer seems like a pretty good place,
though I realize that this is inconsistent with other files the client stores. Probably we should
store the [username].[archive] files in there as well, but let's not worry about that for this
release.

--Rob


--- Marc Palmer <ma...@an...> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'm trying it out... and I cleared the "external path for .source.jam" 
> setting and now I can't get any files an have SJ actually think I have 
> the latest version, it always shows them out of date.
> 
> How do you make SJ 2.1.2 work the way it used to?!
> 
> Also, I changed the setting to blank, exitted SJ, ran it again and magic 
> - the .\sourcejammer.projectinfo setting is back!
> 
> Cheers
> 
> 
> -- 
> Marc Palmer    wj...@wa...
> 			
> Wangjammers - Java, J2ME and Web Consultants
>    ~ http://www.wangjammers.org/
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> SourceJammer-devel mailing list
> Sou...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sourcejammer-devel
> 


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/