Re: [Sooc-devel] why Sooc?

[Dan R. <sta...@gm...>]

Okay, that sounds reasonable enough.

On 8/21/07, Mike Richman <mik...@gm...> wrote:
>
> If we port a gtkmm project, we will have to work with GObject to an
> extent.  In particular, a C++ project is likely to include derived
> widgets.  Those are a major pain with GtkWidget.  But with Sooc, they
> can be expressed using a combination of composition and inheritance,
> which I did easily enough in OTweeze.  The SGtkWidget wrapper for
> GtkWidget was designed in like 5 minutes and it was straightforward
> enough to use.  In fact, it's because this is exactly the sort of
> challenge Sooc needs to handle gracefully that I think a gtkmm project
> would be appropriate.  Also, the gtkmm website maintains a list of
> some client projects, which might be a good starting point in choosing
> a project.
>
> That said, a completely different project might be still more
> appropriate.  I'll be thinking about C++ and Java apps I know of... or
> maybe we can just find something on SF somewhere :)
>
> -Mike
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
> Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
> Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
> Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Sooc-devel mailing list
> Soo...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sooc-devel
>