Re: [Sooc-devel] why Sooc?

[Dan R. <sta...@gm...>]

Doesn't gtk+ use GObject?  I thought maybe that porting a GUI app that uses
the GObject hierarchy would make the Sooc object system less obvious.  Or at
least it would add complication to this test.

On 8/20/07, Mike Richman <mik...@gm...> wrote:
>
> I don't know that it has to be a console utility.  We should really
> just be looking for something reasonably small writtenin C++ or Java.
> If a GUI is involved, we can port it to GTK+.  I know this would
> complicate the comparison of Sooc with the other object systems, but
> Sooc needs to be proven to work well with GTK+ to be practical anyway.
> There's nothing wrong with learning a little Swing, gtkmm, Qt,
> networking, image handling, or any other random thing on the fly, I
> don't think.  This is especially true if we focus primarily on porting
> the object system itself and only worry about the underlying
> algorithms in the original code if we need to change it.
>
> So... what small utilities do we (I?) like and would we (I?) be
> interested in porting?  I'll be thinking about it; let me know if you
> come up with anything.
>
> -Mike
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
> Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
> Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
> Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Sooc-devel mailing list
> Soo...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sooc-devel
>