Re: [Somelib] more changes

[John P. (Quinticent) <jo...@ma...>]

I fixed that, just haven't checked it in.  It has to do with the test
utility.  Earlier versions of test use = not ==.

I tried compiling on a Sun Solaris using the Linux build.  Theoretically
they should be the same.  Well the sources compiled but they refused to
link.  I got 500 lines of gibberish error messages.  One thing I hate about
templates is that it makes error messages hard to debug.  Could be that they
are not using the GNU linker. I'll check it out.  Do you know anyone who
knows about Solaris?  I have someone looking into the BSD builds too.

-Quinticent

Thomas Matelich wrote:

> I'm in the process of commiting a few changes.  I implemented the dynlib
> stuff for windows and hpux.  One problem I'm noticing with the config
> stuff.  On hp and one of my two linux boxes (same autoconf version,
> 2.13) I get and error running configure on the lines where is checks
> platform equal to linux,hpux,...
>
> on the one linux box it says
> ./configure: test: ==: binary operator expected
>
> on hpux it says:
> configure[580]: ==: A test command parameter is not valid.
>
> 3 errors for the 3 checks.
>
> If you could look into that, I'd appreciate it.
>
> --
> Thomas O Matelich
> Senior Software Designer
> Zetec, Inc.
> sos...@us...
> tma...@ze...
>
> _______________________________________________
> somelib-devel mailing list
> som...@li...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/somelib-devel