Re: [Somelib] Fixed!

[John P. <jo...@ma...>]

Nice.  So can you give a tiny bit of code to show how to invoke a
raw/smart/etc. pointer?  We should provide a way to perhaps do lazy
loading of libraries where only a Libraries catalog is loaded and retained
in memory.  When an object is requested from a perticular lib the lib is
loaded in some sort of cache and flushed after it hasn't been used in
quite awhile.  We could provide mechanisms for keeping libs always in
memory for speed/space tradeoffs.  For right now though I think SOMELib is
solid in terms of functionality.  It does what we set out for it to do and
barring any more major bugs I think it is ready for beta. Stability is now
the top priority.  Functionality can wait till 2.0.

-Quinticent

Thomas Matelich wrote:

> I fixed the bug, sort of.  The problem was that I was delete'ing lib
> from LibCatalog in the destructor.  I removed that.  Now the problem is
> that I'm not deleteing it at all.  Your libs will never be unloaded.
> Not a problem now because we had no available functionality to do that
> in the first place, but in the future...
>
> Anyway, the recently proposed changes to SOME::Object have been
> implemented.  I need to change the TestApp so that it tests each way to
> get objects.  We now have a bunch more examples that need to be written
> :)
>
> Gotta go and prepare a class on Unit Testing for my co-workers using my
> test framework based on CppUnit and SOMELib!!!
>
> --
> Thomas O Matelich
> Senior Software Designer
> Zetec, Inc.
> sos...@us...
> tma...@ze...
>
> _______________________________________________
> somelib-devel mailing list
> som...@li...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/somelib-devel