Re: [softwerk-dev] Troubles with Softwerk

[Dave P. <dl...@br...>]

Greetings:

  Still no joy. At this point my head is approaching the consistency of
setting concrete. I'll try again tomorrow, gotta catch some zzzsss...

  Btw, when I ran conftest outside of the SoftWerk home directory I
received this message:

./conftest: error in loading shared libraries: libpbd-1-1-1.so: cannot
open shared object file: No such file or directory

   And 'ldd conftest' reported:

[dlphilp@localhost dlphilp]$ ldd conftest
        libpbd-1-1-1.so => not found
        libltdl.so.0 => /usr/lib/libltdl.so.0 (0x4001d000)
        libsigc-1.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libsigc-1.0.so.0 (0x40021000)
        libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x40030000)
        libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 => /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2
(0x40041000)
        libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x40083000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x4009f000)
        libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x40193000)
        /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000)


   Note that I built conftest in /home/dlphilp. I added the complete
paths for the includes in conftest.C. I'm yawning now, been up too
long...

Best regards,

== Dave Phillips

	The Book Of Linux Music & Sound (http://www.nostarch.com/lms.htm)
	The Linux Soundapps Site (http://www.bright.net/~dlphilp/linuxsound/)

Currently listening to: "Heliosphan" by Aphex Twin


Paul Barton-Davis wrote:
> 
> In message <3A2...@br...>you write:
> >Greetings:
> >
> >  It compiled fine, not one complaint. So what do you think is happening
> 
> i have an idea. a fairly good idea. and its a problem in every single
> library of mine. observe:
> 
> >> int main(int argc,char **argv)
> >>   {
> >>    if (pbd_major_version!=1 ||
> >>        pbd_minor_version!=1 ||
> >>        pbd_micro_version!=1)
> >>      { printf("(%d.%d.%d) ",
> >>          pbd_major_version,pbd_minor_version,pbd_micro_version);
> >>        return 1;
> >>      }
> >>   }
> 
> now, what do you suppose this program returns if the versions numbers
> *do* match ?
> 
> 10 extra points if you can say "its undefined".
> 
> once i hear from you the result of running it, i'll put together a new
> version of the tarball. you can either add:
> 
>         return 0;
> 
> as the final statement of main(), or get the new tarball, heh,
> heh. strictly speaking, all my libraries need this. i'll leave it to
> you whether to patch them by hand (for library "foo", its
> .../softwerk/libs/src/foo/foo.m4 that contains the relevant source code)
> 
> BTW, I got this program from some other GNU auto*-using program. I
> wonder how many other programs have this problem ? or was it just me
> forgetting to add the "return 0;" in place.
> 
> I hope this is really the problem - its a giant discovery for me, even
> if its not the problem. so thanks.
> 
> --p
> 
> ps. for CVS users, the changes have just been committed.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Softwerk-dev mailing list
> Sof...@li...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/softwerk-dev

--