Re: [softwerk-dev] Troubles with Softwerk

[Dave P. <dl...@br...>]

Paul Barton-Davis wrote:
 
> Dave - yes, there are no clues there. can you send me the actual
> output from configure as it runs ?
> 
> just as one possible hint, after you send me that output, try "rm
> config.cache" before another run of configure and see if that helps.


Hi, Paul: Here's the configure output, with libpbd already compiled and
existing in libs/lib:

[dlphilp@localhost libs]$ make
echo srcs gtkmmext guileconfig midi++ pbd
srcs gtkmmext guileconfig midi++ pbd
mkdir -p build/gtkmmext build/guileconfig build/midi++ build/pbd
if [ ! -f .configured_pbd ] ; then \
        (cd build/pbd; ../../src/pbd/configure --disable-static
--prefix=/home/dlphilp/softwerk-1.99.1/libs); \
fi
touch .configured_pbd
if [ ! -f .configured_gtkmmext ] ; then \
        (cd build/gtkmmext; ../../src/gtkmmext/configure
--disable-static --prefix=/home/dlphilp/softwerk-1.99.1/libs);\
        fi
loading cache ./config.cache
checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking target system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking cached system tuple... ok
checking for a BSD compatible install... (cached) /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking whether make sets ${MAKE}... (cached) yes
checking for working aclocal... found
checking for working autoconf... found
checking for working automake... found
checking for working autoheader... found
checking for working makeinfo... found
checking for c++... (cached) c++
checking whether the C++ compiler (c++  ) works... yes
checking whether the C++ compiler (c++  ) is a cross-compiler... no
checking whether we are using GNU C++... (cached) yes
checking whether c++ accepts -g... (cached) yes
checking for gcc... (cached) gcc
checking whether the C compiler (gcc  ) works... yes
checking whether the C compiler (gcc  ) is a cross-compiler... no
checking whether we are using GNU C... (cached) yes
checking whether gcc accepts -g... (cached) yes
checking for ld used by GCC... (cached) /usr/bin/ld
checking if the linker (/usr/bin/ld) is GNU ld... (cached) yes
checking for ranlib... (cached) ranlib
checking for BSD-compatible nm... (cached) /usr/bin/nm -B
checking whether ln -s works... (cached) yes
checking for object suffix... o
checking for gcc option to produce PIC... -fPIC
checking if gcc PIC flag -fPIC works... yes
checking if gcc supports -c -o file.o... yes
checking if gcc supports -c -o file.lo... yes
checking if gcc supports -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions ... yes
checking if gcc static flag -static works... -static
checking if the linker (/usr/bin/ld) is GNU ld... yes
checking whether the linker (/usr/bin/ld) supports shared libraries...
yes
checking command to parse /usr/bin/nm -B output... ok
checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate
checking for /usr/bin/ld option to reload object files... -r
checking dynamic linker characteristics... Linux ld.so
checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes
checking whether to build shared libraries... yes
checking whether to build static libraries... no
checking for objdir... .libs
creating libtool
loading cache ./config.cache
checking for sigc-config... /usr/local/bin/sigc-config
checking for libsigc++ - version >= 0.8.0... 1.0.1
checking if libsigc++ sane... yes
checking for glib-config... /usr/local/bin/glib-config
checking for GLIB - version >= 1.0.0... yes
checking for gtk-config... /usr/local/bin/gtk-config
checking for GTK - version >= 1.0.0... yes
checking for gtkmm-config... /usr/local/bin/gtkmm-config
checking for GTK-- - version >= 1.2.0... yes
checking for pbd-config...
/home/dlphilp/softwerk-1.99.1/libs/bin/pbd-config
checking for libpbd - version >= 1.1.0... 1.1.1
checking if libpbd sane... no
configure: error: *** libgtkmmext requires libpbd v1.1, but it doesn't
appear to be installed
make: *** [.configured_gtkmmext] Error 1


I had already tried removing the cache, but got no joy. Tried it again,
still no joy.

Just for clarity's sake: My system is a beefed-up RH 6.2, with
low-latency patch on kernel 2.4.0-test9 and XFree86 4.01, if that should
matter at all. I upgraded a number of things for the 2.4 instalation,
could there be a mismatch of utils somewhere ??

Best regards,

== Dave Phillips

	http://www.bright.net/~dlphilp/index.html
	http://www.bright.net/~dlphilp/linuxsound/

Currently listening to: "Mutations" by Jean-Claude Risset...ya gotta
love those Shepard tones...!