I see the next log at sysconf application start :
STARTING(load_dll, dll_file='so_sysconf.breakflag_handler.dll', mandatory=no) SUCESSED(load_dll, dll_file='so_sysconf.breakflag_handler.dll', mandatory=no) STARTING(load_dll, dll_file='so_sysconf_log.sysconf.dll', mandatory=yes) SUCESSED(load_dll, dll_file='so_sysconf_log.sysconf.dll', mandatory=yes) STARTING(reg_coop_by_handler, coop_handler='so_sysconf_log::sysconf::log', cfg_file='') SUCESSED(reg_coop_by_handler, coop_handler='so_sysconf_log::sysconf::log', cfg_file='') STARTING(load_dll, dll_file='so_sysconf.so_transport_layer.dll', mandatory=yes) SUCESSED(load_dll, dll_file='so_sysconf.so_transport_layer.dll', mandatory=yes) ...
What strange word (or abbreviation?) SUCESSED is.. What does it stand for?
It is just misspelling for 'SUCCESSED'
Interesting..
However, I still could not find the word "successed" in any dictionary.
You could propose your variant. Or even better: you could make changes in sysconf branch :)
It's already fixed: https://sourceforge.net/p/sobjectizer/repo/540/
Hm.. Ok, but it means that we use rather old version.
Log in to post a comment.
I see the next log at sysconf application start :
What strange word (or abbreviation?) SUCESSED is.. What does it stand for?
It is just misspelling for 'SUCCESSED'
Interesting..
However, I still could not find the word "successed" in any dictionary.
You could propose your variant. Or even better: you could make changes in sysconf branch :)
It's already fixed:
https://sourceforge.net/p/sobjectizer/repo/540/
Hm.. Ok, but it means that we use rather old version.