From: Byrne R. <by...@ma...> - 2007-11-18 20:25:39
|
+1 Martin Kutter wrote: > Hi there, > > after doing some maintenance work, I've been stumbling accross some of > the limitations of CVS. > > As I'm (both private and professionally) am using subversion for all > other projects, I'd like to move SOAP-Lite's repository to SVN, too. > > Theres two main reasons for doing so: > > * Accessibility via HTTP(S) > Subversion on SF.net can be accessed via http(s). To me it means that I > can access SOAP-Lite's repository from everywhere. Right now I'm > sometimes having troubles to connect through company firewalls. > > * Lazyness > SVN keeps a global revision number (and a global revision log) for the > whole repository. When compiling the Changes file for a release, yll a > maintainer has to do is typing "svn history" and look through the commit > messages. This is impossible with CVS, as CVS keeps a log for every > file. > > There's a few other reasons I'm not going to discuss in detail - if you > need more info on differences between CVS and SVN, just ask. > > SF.net provides SVN repositories, and instruction on how to migrate > (using cvs2svn - I have been migrating the twentysomething repositories > of my former team with cvs2svn without having troubles). > > If there's no opinions against the migration, I'll proceed - please let > me know your thoughts. > > Thanks, > > Martin > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Soaplite-devel mailing list > Soa...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soaplite-devel > |