From: Byrne R. <by...@ma...> - 2003-10-28 14:52:21
|
I am happy to hear you are coding away. I too am working on a new WSDL2Perl utility. I will check what I have into CVS soon, but it is all based upon the WS-I interoperability demonstration. http://www.xmethods.net/wsid/ As I stated in my previous email, I think it is important to build consensus on what the generated code should look like - especially considering the fact that there are a million and one ways to do anything in Perl. I am very curious to see what your perl code looks like given a WSDL that looks like: http://www.xmethods.net/wsid-08-2002/wsdl/ISupplier.wsdl That is the WSDL I am working off of. By all means, send me what you have! > Thanks for the assistance. I think that I can be of some help. I have been > very busy implementing a SOAP::Lite server that would accept and dispatch > complex types to and from a .NET SOAP server at my job, but we are through > the worst of it so I am looking forward to spending more time taking some > of > the work that I've already done and porting it to the trunk of the > SOAP::Lite tree (and get some class credit for this too :) ). > > I've spent a little time creating a framework where the elements and > attributes of the wsdl complex types could be laid out similarly to the > way > the current stubmaker lays out the endpoint connections. Hooks would be > created for the message objects and the code will properly serialize the > data as elements or attributes from a hash that is passed in. It doesn't > automatically parse the WSDL to generate the array, but it's laid out in a > way where that would be quite possible. Hopefully, this could be helpful > in > the format that we finalize on. > > How should we stay in contact? Do you use IM or IRC or should we stick to > email for now? Speaking of which, use cal...@ya... in the > future, since that is my personal e-mail address. I also use the same name > under YIM. > > I'm anxious to continue with this and I'm looking forward to continuing > this > work. In the meantimes I'll continue working on extending the stubmaker to > generate that code that I described above. > > -Calvin > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Byrne Reese [mailto:by...@ma...] > Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 11:38 PM > To: calvin_g_smith > Subject: Re: SOAP::Lite development > > > We are in desparate need of this help. In fact, some folks at ActiveState > have volunteered to donate an XSL script that could be used to generate > SOAP::Lite stub-code. > > There is still some planning work that needs to be done, and in all > honesty, it is the most important work to do. > > What we need to do is create the reference code that will serve as a basis > for what all SOAP::Lite code SHOULD look like. In other words, given a > very standard WSDL - in this case, the WSDL for the WSI Interoperability > Demonstration - we need to author the canonical perl code for it. Using > that as a template, we would modify the XSL stylesheet to create stubs > given any WSDL. > > If this is something you would still like to embark on, your help would be > hugely appreciated! I would be happy to work with you and collaborate - it > is indeed something that is on my plate to do... I could act as a > reviewer, or co-developer, or whatever. Just let me know how you would > like to proceed. > >> I am interested in getting involved with the development of SOAP::Lite >> potentially as part of a school project. I was looking at the lack of >> complexType support in the stubmaker.pl script and maybe adding >> support for that. Please let me know whether that's already done or in >> progress and I don't know about it yet or if it's available as a >> project that can be done. >> >> Thanks in advance, >> >> -Calvin >> >> PS Whether I can do this as a school project is dependent of course on >> approval from my teacher but I would find out fairly quickly. >> >> > > > ^byrne :/ > > ^byrne :/ |