From: Jason S. <jas...@gm...> - 2008-09-19 01:07:16
|
Hey Martin, On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 11:30 PM, Martin Kutter <mar...@fe...> wrote: > Hi Jason, > > your proposed patch reads fine - I'll try it out. cool, thanks! > I don't know whether o_value is used somewhere, or whether there has > just been some planned usage which has been left unimplemented - I'll > have to look it up. > > SOAP::Lite's biggest problem by now is that the test suite is relatively > weak, so we cannot tell whether some change breaks existing SOAP::Lite > applications. And SOAP::Lite is so widespread that breaking existing > code is a pretty bad thing... Ah, good to know that. How can I help? I have a contract that will pay me money to help SOAP::Lite improve itself. Can I add more test cases? If so which ones would be good to focus on? Does the documentation need updating? Which parts? Do new pieces need adding - I heard someone mention the idea of a cookbook. Does the code need to be re-worked? I don't have much of an issue with the code as it stands - but I do find a large number of subroutines that have similar names and similar purposes and aren't exactly clear as to what they do. But that is because I am new to the codebase. Any other ways that I could spend someone else's money and help the Perl and SOAP::Lite community? Cheers, jas. |