Re: [Soaplab-users] soaplab2 plugin problems
Brought to you by:
marsenger
From: Sirisha G. <si...@my...> - 2009-08-03 11:18:06
|
Hi Mahmut, Still the same problem and a more worrying issue now - Taverna won't start :( getting the following, so perhaps I should take it over to taverna-users instead... Exception occured in getInstance java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Host name may not be null at org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpHost.<init>(HttpHost.java:67) at org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpHost.<init>(HttpHost.java:106) at org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpMethodBase.setURI(HttpMethodBase.java:276) at org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpMethodBase.<init>(HttpMethodBase.java:217) at org.apache.commons.httpclient.methods.GetMethod.<init>(GetMethod.java:88) at net.sf.taverna.update.plugin.PluginManager.getPluginsFromSite(PluginManager.java:391) at net.sf.taverna.update.plugin.PluginManager.checkForUpdates(PluginManager.java:548) at net.sf.taverna.update.plugin.ui.UpdatesAvailableIcon.pluginUpdateAvailable(UpdatesAvailableIcon.java:151) at net.sf.taverna.update.plugin.ui.UpdatesAvailableIcon.checkForUpdates(UpdatesAvailableIcon.java:135) at net.sf.taverna.update.plugin.ui.UpdatesAvailableIcon.<init>(UpdatesAvailableIcon.java:80) at org.embl.ebi.escience.scuflui.workbench.Workbench.setUI(Workbench.java:336) at org.embl.ebi.escience.scuflui.workbench.Workbench.<init>(Workbench.java:201) at org.embl.ebi.escience.scuflui.workbench.Workbench.getInstance(Workbench.java:134) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at net.sf.taverna.tools.Bootstrap.invokeWorkbench(Bootstrap.java:192) at net.sf.taverna.tools.Bootstrap.main(Bootstrap.java:75) Mahmut Uludag wrote: > Hi Sirisha, > >> after uninstalling and restarting Taverna, when I >> add the plugin site (http://soaplab.sourceforge.net/taverna-plugin/) the >> only available plugin version is 2.1.1.7-beta - should I go ahead with >> that, or should it say the different version number? > > yes it should, looks like there is some caching? just to be make sure i > now also deleted the plugin definition, last time i only delete it from > the available plugins list (when testing here taverna didn't see it so i > was reluctant to delete it completely, i don't know why taverna still > sees it in your case). Can you please try again? > > Mahmut > > This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment may still contain software viruses, which could damage your computer system: you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation. |