From: Roman G. <sl...@sl...> - 2007-04-14 14:42:32
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Victor Julien wrote: > Will Metcalf wrote: >> Looks like PE analysis code in clamav is causing it to blow up, >> we can add some code to deal with this return value but I want to >> dig into it a bit more before we decide to do so. >> > If you look at the negative returncodes from clamav.h you can see > we can't kill snort for (all of) them (as we assumed before): > > #define CL_EIO -12 /* general I/O error */ #define > CL_EFORMAT -13 /* bad format or broken file */ > > My suggestion is to not use FatalError but create an alert for > this, something like "Virusscan Failed" and add an option to the > configuration to enable the admin to either pass or drop failed > scans. While we are at it we should do the same for the positive > returncodes. What do you think? > > Cheers, Victor > i think it is great idea!! look, when i have ids in inline mode and it crashes because of this thing.... it is something wich should never happen! please let admins to choose . thank you all, roman glebov -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQIVAwUBRiDns7hQu20hGMIkAQL6lw//UCNJJtrMeCyzZrZskoqlTMSOjpo2Jo20 jdpjQegM6mWFR4MEnSsk/RhjZWzYssAQ36Gwxj+A7TA8U85OzahkOaI8EK6D6Loo 4/5s56twUaQKbdNpSDNySdli1pigVQnejjtNVun1Gn7o8/HbZPUfMAUV3BZOLbwl n7ZajDtgstVzCnvVMdZ8ONnzuo+/8nXH2ai/ATp2DIBucB9rwEdwGZxEkL51Ot/S UgCPlAz4k0FUC4ZC1PONaXFpaKvxN7Jl4jV5W1JK7ktPa2xgBQamUm87eHC/9/I7 dtmfW0IeR0mHrthKpOTY/APmzBMfydTpNmMfyKWO4Z8EjqEv5S1OUQ/H8iuJnJF2 hso0RumIPTlDxgkLLF8oOiueYWrjtK8/23nRRZdqruDqOo2D16Kep81TpHTwup4K EvWQ89AEHJ9c8OdkVp3sDMPHeytx+ENkjSltEInmLTx54/7x9ElhREx3XFKjS1sS pSxryRpuqrol/lThQRrMv0qNTXDOGSZjdtbS9igvWxt+DmmvDbc/R9K5SqCZLlSJ Tp3H8gN5v3kvFuFejePp0Cy16Uk6O5qlcJzixCPp7xNE5gJ3VmB3A2s3B405GQWF /Apc6bIGqnkYPaQS8cySVYuVMEfcApJpTelki1KBw8Ogx6xvfbwfE543C6TdLGbl vIeAXpx2Smg= =jrCr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |