From: Yap S. H. <sin...@ex...> - 2005-02-22 02:48:51
|
Hi Will, I agree what you are saying, but in certain circumstances when budget is a concern for customer, then we need to work out a solution to fix the budget as well as to minimize the downtime. Is there a way other than having another redundant box, Snort_inline can still allow traffic to pass in the event of power loss or other failures? regards -----Original Message----- From: Will Metcalf [mailto:wil...@gm...] Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 1:45 AM To: sin...@ex... Cc: sno...@li... Subject: Re: [Snort-inline-users] Help- Snort_inline Single Point of Failure Not really sure what you are asking me here. Are you asking me if a box running snort-inline dies how to get traffic to pass? The short answer is if you don't have redundent connections to whatever network segment you are trying to protect you can't do this. This isn't a snort-inline limitation though, this is a network design limitation. Regards, Will On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:59:30 +0800, Yap Sin Hoe <sin...@ex...> wrote: > > > > Is snort-inline a single point of failure when the box facing hardware > failure, for example power supply problem. Any idea how to solve this? > > > > > Best regards, > > Shyap > > > > |