From: Rob M. <ro...@ho...> - 2004-06-16 19:16:37
|
Thought about it, but it seems like a very large project. I figured it could be similar to iptables. The rules portion lives on=20 userspace and the functionality lives in kernel space. The user builds=20 the rules which are parsed in user land and this data is passed to the=20 kernel. However, I do all of this part time, and I haven't had much time= =20 as of late to think about this. Many people out there with time to move this to kernel space? I will be integrating and posting Williams patches and upgrades soon. =20 Just got back from traveling and trying to take care of some personal=20 dilemmas I am encountering. Thanks William Rob On Wed, 16 Jun 2004, [ISO-8859-1] C=E9dric BLIN wrote: > Date: 16 Jun 2004 16:47:54 +0200 > From: "[ISO-8859-1] C=E9dric BLIN" <ced...@ev...> > To: sno...@li... > Subject: [snort-inline-users] Kernel space >=20 > Hello, >=20 > I want to know if someone have already though to migrate Snort into the > kernel space ? >=20 > Thanks, > Cedric >=20 > --=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference > Learn from the experts at JavaOne(SM), Sun's Worldwide Java Developer > Conference, June 28 - July 1 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, CA > REGISTER AND SAVE! http://java.sun.com/javaone/sf Priority Code NWMGYKND > _______________________________________________ > Snort-inline-users mailing list > Sno...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-inline-users >=20 |