Re: [Sml-implementers] A list of ambiguities in SML?

[Martin E. <ma...@it...>]

Hi,

I think it would be great with a maintained list. I believe Andreas
Rossberg's work is a good starting point:

  http://www.ps.uni-sb.de/Papers/abstracts/sml-defects.html

His list does not mention the problem about "too large" real
constants, however.

Best regards,

Martin

Dave Berry <dav...@bt...> writes:

> Every now and again someone raises a question about a minor ambiguity in
> the Definition of SML, such as Stephen's question about "too large" real
> constants.  Is anyone keeping a list of these. It might be useful to keep
> these in a public place, together with any agreements that the implementors
> reach about how to resolve the ambiguities in practice.
>
> I guess that as I'm suggesting it, I should also volunteer to maintain such
> a document if no-one better qualified wishes to do so.
>
> Dave.
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
> Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
> See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
> http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
> _______________________________________________
> Sml-implementers mailing list
> Sml...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sml-implementers