Re: [Sml-implementers] Structure sharing and type abbreviations

[Stefan M. <monnier+lists.smlnj.users/news/@flint.cs.yale.edu>]

>>>>> "Dave" == Dave Berry <da...@ta...> writes:
>> 9. At the level of syntax, I would support fixing the case ambiguity,
>> eliminating clausal function definitions entirely, fixing the treatment of
>> "and" and "rec" in val bindings, changing the syntax of handlers, and
>> probably make a few other surface syntax changes.

After quickly perusing the SML definition, I still don't know what's
a "clausal function definition".  Could someone enlighten me ?


	Stefan