[SMI-ontos] The Ordered List Ontology and the SWAN Collections Ontology
Status: Alpha
Brought to you by:
zazi
From: Bob F. <za...@sm...> - 2011-03-13 23:47:20
|
Hi, I recently had an email exchange with Paolo Ciccarese [1], who is the maintainer of the SWAN Collections Ontology [2]. Thereby, we also discussed the alignment of this ontology with OLO. AFAIK, this issue was already discussed a bit, when I announced the first drafts of OLO (see [3,4,5]). Paolo is quite interested in a mixing of the two ontologies. Here are shortly the main difference between them: - OLO has olo:index as primary access method for slots - OLO has more restrictions on its properties then the equal ones in the SWAN Collections Ontology - the SWAN Collections Ontology has properties for relating transitive slots in a sequence (we initially excluded this feature) - the SWAN Collections Ontology has properties for first/last slot in a sequence (this issue is on the OLO TODO list [6], too, since it was requested) What do you think about a mixing of these two ontologies? Cheers, Bob [1] http://www.paolociccarese.info/ [2] http://swan.mindinformatics.org/spec/1.2/collections.html [3] http://groups.google.com/group/music-ontology-specification-group/browse_frm/thread/dfcb68d7336394fa?tvc=1&q=Ordered+List+Ontology especially http://groups.google.com/group/music-ontology-specification-group/msg/f7e893c9090a00e2 [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2010Jun/0173.html [5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2010Jun/0174.html [6] http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3204815&group_id=333907&atid=1399770 |