|
From: Pennell, D. <DPe...@qu...> - 2003-10-16 00:10:50
|
> I think there are two things you're suggesting here. You're suggesting > that XSL be extended to have a JS mode, where the output of the > function is the result of executing the JS? > > Then it also sounds like you want a way to define a template match > using JS. I don't think this is a good idea. If you support the > function idea then you can embed functions in a template match any > way. > > Adding a function to XSL to evaluate JS should be quite easy to do. > I've added a couple myself already now. OK, I'll wait until somebody asks before jumping on this one. -david |