RE: Re[2]: [Smee-development] Thoughts on example for host integr ation

[Pennell, D. <DPe...@qu...>]

> I think there are two things you're suggesting here. You're suggesting 
> that XSL be extended to have a JS mode, where the output of the 
> function is the result of executing the JS?
> 
> Then it also sounds like you want a way to define a template match 
> using JS. I don't think this is a good idea. If you support the 
> function idea then you can embed functions in a template match any 
> way.
> 
> Adding a function to XSL to evaluate JS should be quite easy to do.
> I've added a couple myself already now.

OK, I'll wait until somebody asks before jumping on this one.

-david