Re: [smartweb-devel] Static sign on auth module less understandable

[Stefano V <st...@gm...>]

You are right! i didn't read what you had said...
Sorry :-)

2007/11/9, Roberto Lo Giacco <rlo...@sm...>:
>
> Just a note to the Valid tag statement: you are right, but I supposed
> he wanted to check the user inside an Action or something like that as
> we strongly suggest not to use java code inside pages :->
>
> Am I right or have you repeated, with another example, my same statement?
>
> 2007/11/9, Stefano V <st...@gm...>:
> > I don't agree :-)
> > This is a wrong way to check if the user is logged in,
> > becuse  when you are not logged in  User.get() return Guest User !
> > You have to use the Valid tag in jsp or in other place i suggest you to
> use
> > code similar to this:
> >
> > User user = User.get();
> > boolean loggedin =
> > !net.smartlab.web.auth.User.isGuest(user);
> >
> >
> >
> > 2007/11/9, Pino Contartese <gco...@gm... >:
> > >
> > >
> > > Ok better express the proposal reproposing a real case
> > > I have to check that the user is logged in or not and I write:
> > > If (net.smartlab.web.auth.User.get ()! = null) (
> > > ...
> > > It doesn't seem so friendly ..it was better for me to use it with
> antoher
> > > sign like I suggest before
> > > net.smartlab.web.auth.User.getCurrent() !=null
> > >
> > > Do you agree with me ?
> > >
> > >
> > > Roberto Lo Giacco wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Do you mean auth module with the statement form auth?
> > > > In case I understood correctly I think this could be a minor change
> into
> > > > the auth module API but I'm not sure what the advantages will be...
> can
> > > > you provide any reason for the change?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Pino Contartese wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Uhmm ...
> > > >> Hi Stephen,I start to use  the form auth and I have noticed that
> the
> > > >> signature of static method User.get () is a little understandable.
> It
> > > >> would be more understandable User.getCurrent ()?
> > > >> I expect a response from everyone on ..
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > View this message in context:
> >
> http://www.nabble.com/Static-sign-on-auth-module-less-understandable-tf4774615s17546.html#a13667696
> > > Sent from the SmartWeb Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
> > > Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
> > > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a
> browser.
> > > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > smartweb-devel mailing list
> > > sma...@li...
> > >
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/smartweb-devel
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
> > Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
> > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
> > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
> > _______________________________________________
> > smartweb-devel mailing list
> > sma...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/smartweb-devel
> >
> >
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
> Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
> Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
> Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
> _______________________________________________
> smartweb-devel mailing list
> sma...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/smartweb-devel
>