Re: [smartweb-devel] Static sign on auth module less understandable
Brought to you by:
rlogiacco
From: Roberto Lo G. <rlo...@sm...> - 2007-11-09 15:59:59
|
We are trying to write down a user guide, but we welcome any contribution as it seems we all are not very capable on documentation ;) 2007/11/9, Pino Contartese <gco...@gm...>: > > Where can I find an auth guide? > > > Roberto Lo Giacco-4 wrote: > > > > By the way: if you need to check if there is a user logged in you > > should use the User.isGuest() method as User.get() always returns a > > not null object.... ;) > > > > 2007/11/9, Pino Contartese <gco...@gm...>: > >> > >> Ok better express the proposal reproposing a real case > >> I have to check that the user is logged in or not and I write: > >> If (net.smartlab.web.auth.User.get ()! = null) ( > >> ... > >> It doesn't seem so friendly ..it was better for me to use it with antoher > >> sign like I suggest before > >> net.smartlab.web.auth.User.getCurrent() !=null > >> > >> Do you agree with me ? > >> > >> > >> Roberto Lo Giacco wrote: > >> > > >> > Do you mean auth module with the statement form auth? > >> > In case I understood correctly I think this could be a minor change > >> into > >> > the auth module API but I'm not sure what the advantages will be... can > >> > you provide any reason for the change? > >> > > >> > > >> > Pino Contartese wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Uhmm ... > >> >> Hi Stephen,I start to use the form auth and I have noticed that the > >> >> signature of static method User.get () is a little understandable. It > >> >> would be more understandable User.getCurrent ()? > >> >> I expect a response from everyone on .. > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> -- > >> View this message in context: > >> http://www.nabble.com/Static-sign-on-auth-module-less-understandable-tf4774615s17546.html#a13667696 > >> Sent from the SmartWeb Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > >> Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > >> Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > >> Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > >> _______________________________________________ > >> smartweb-devel mailing list > >> sma...@li... > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/smartweb-devel > >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > > smartweb-devel mailing list > > sma...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/smartweb-devel > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Static-sign-on-auth-module-less-understandable-tf4774615s17546.html#a13669580 > Sent from the SmartWeb Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > _______________________________________________ > smartweb-devel mailing list > sma...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/smartweb-devel > |