Re: [smartweb-devel] Static sign on auth module less understandable

[Pino C. <gco...@gm...>]

Ok better express the proposal reproposing a real case
I have to check that the user is logged in or not and I write:
If (net.smartlab.web.auth.User.get ()! = null) (
...
It doesn't seem so friendly ..it was better for me to use it with antoher
sign like I suggest before
net.smartlab.web.auth.User.getCurrent() !=null

Do you agree with me ?


Roberto Lo Giacco wrote:
> 
> Do you mean auth module with the statement form auth?
> In case I understood correctly I think this could be a minor change into
> the auth module API but I'm not sure what the advantages will be... can
> you provide any reason for the change?
> 
> 
> Pino Contartese wrote:
>> 
>> Uhmm ...
>> Hi Stephen,I start to use  the form auth and I have noticed that the
>> signature of static method User.get () is a little understandable. It
>> would be more understandable User.getCurrent ()?
>> I expect a response from everyone on ..
>> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Static-sign-on-auth-module-less-understandable-tf4774615s17546.html#a13667696
Sent from the SmartWeb Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.