Re: [smartweb-devel] Static sign on auth module less understandable
Brought to you by:
rlogiacco
From: Roberto Lo G. <rlo...@us...> - 2007-11-09 10:05:15
|
Do you mean auth module with the statement form auth? In case I understood correctly I think this could be a minor change into the auth module API but I'm not sure what the advantages will be... can you provide any reason for the change? Pino Contartese wrote: > > Uhmm ... > Hi Stephen,I start to use the form auth and I have noticed that the > signature of static method User.get () is a little understandable. It > would be more understandable User.getCurrent ()? > I expect a response from everyone on .. > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Static-sign-on-auth-module-less-understandable-tf4774615s17546.html#a13664231 Sent from the SmartWeb Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |