Re: [smartweb-devel] Configuration file extension misleading

[Pino C. <gco...@gm...>]

rlogiacco wrote:
> 
> I started to think the .hcf extension modification was not a so brillant
> idea for al least two reasons:
> 
> 1. it confuses developers which tendo to have difficulties to understand
> it's just an hibernate.cfg.xml file with a differente name;
> 2. it confuses programs which need to be configured properly to understand
> it's an XML file.
> 
> May be it would be better to switch back to the standard naming to solve
> this problems, but we still need to allow custom additional files to be
> deployed in a shared area. May be a hibernate[-modulename].cfg.xml schema
> is what we need.
> 
> The impact on the file naming is strong as will be the impact on users
> knowledge: those who already understood the .hcf extension will be
> confused, but the new ones should find this simpler. We can also allow for
> both naming for a while...
> 
> Waiting for comments and ideas.
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Configuration-file-extension-misleading-tf3192869s17546.html#a13442397
Sent from the SmartWeb Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.