From: Stanislav B. <sb...@su...> - 2007-04-05 16:31:56
|
Bruce Allen wrote: > Hey Matthew, > > Thanks for sending this. Some brief comments: > > (1) I think it's OK to charge as you are doing. I'm copying the > Developers list since there are other people there who know more than me > about GPL. It's OK in any case to charge even for stand-alone GPL binary. > (2) I suggest that on your main page you mention that the source is GPL. > I think you may need to provide the source code from your web page, not > just included with the program, but I am not sure about this. No, you don't need to put it on web, source + binary on medium is OK. Even only written offer to send source code (valid for 3 years) is OK. > On Wed, 4 Apr 2007, Matthew Butch wrote: > > If I am reading the GPL correctly, I am allowed to charge for it, as > > long as I include the source code with it. I am including the source > > code in the disk image, and I make it clear that my app is based on > > smartmontools. I have not modified smartmontools, I am just using it > > in my GUI. I wanted to check to see what the list thought. As long as you application does not link with smartmontools, it's OK. If you only parse output of smarctl and don't link with its code, any license for GUI is allowed. -- Best Regards / S pozdravem, Stanislav Brabec software developer --------------------------------------------------------------------- SUSE LINUX, s. r. o. e-mail: sb...@su... Lihovarská 1060/12 tel: +420 284 028 966 190 00 Praha 9 fax: +420 284 028 951 Czech Republic http://www.suse.cz/ |