Hi, Uwe.
Your experience matches mine. In general it is faster (with most =20
processor/disk combinations) to read a compressed file and decompress =20=
it, than to read a decompressed file.
Right now there is no way to mount aff-files via a loopback device. =20
However, if you want to write the code, I'll be happy to integrate it!
On Aug 28, 2006, at 3:17 AM, Uwe Danz wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> Sleuthkit works very well with AFF-Harddisk images.
> All tasks run much more quicker with my 9GB aff-file
> instead of the "original" 300GB (test-)dd-image.
>
> Does anyone know a way to mount aff-files via the
> loopback device or via an other way?
>
> Regards,
> Uwe.
> --=20
> "The greatest of all faults is to be conscious of none" Thomas
> Carlyle
>
> Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen!
> Ideal f=FCr Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------=20=
> ---
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, =20
> security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your =20
> job easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache =20
> Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?=20
> cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=3D121642
> _______________________________________________
> sleuthkit-users mailing list
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sleuthkit-users
> http://www.sleuthkit.org
>
|
