Thread: [sleuthkit-developers] [ sleuthkit-Bugs-2840345 ] Meta tags not consistent for DOS partitions
Brought to you by:
carrier
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2009-08-19 14:42:46
|
Bugs item #2840345, was opened at 2009-08-19 09:42 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by carrier You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=477889&aid=2840345&group_id=55685 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Media Management Tools Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Brian Carrier (carrier) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Meta tags not consistent for DOS partitions Initial Comment: TSK 3.0 changed the way that it identified unallocated space and added the notion of META volumes. This report identifies a few issues: - Extended volumes in other extended volumes were not marked as META (but the first extended partition is) - Should we be marking the Partition Table as Unallocated (currently we do because it is not inside of an explicit partition) - Should areas inside of extended partitions be considered unallocated even though they are technically allocated to the extended partition. ------------------- From: mj...@gm... Subject: [sleuthkit-users] bug in mmls 3.01 Date: August 8, 2009 5:28:46 PM EDT To: sle...@li... On my disk. I have 3 primary and one extended partition. In the extended partition, I have multiple logical volumes. When looking at the space between logical partitions, mmls version 2.52 shows 1 sector for the partition table on one line and 62 sectors unallocated on the next line. This is normal. However, version 3.01 shows one line (meta) for the partition table, but no line for the unallocated area. Offsets look strange too (lines 10,11). Ver 2.52: 05: 00:03 0156312450 0312581807 0156269358 Win95 Extended (0x0F) 06: ----- 0156312450 0156312450 0000000001 Extended Table (#1) 07: ----- 0156312451 0156312512 0000000062 Unallocated 08: 01:00 0156312513 0208844999 0052532487 Win95 FAT32 (0x0C) 09: 01:01 0208845000 0271498499 0062653500 DOS Extended (0x05) 10: ----- 0208845000 0208845000 0000000001 Extended Table (#2) 11: ----- 0208845001 0208845062 0000000062 Unallocated ver 3.01 05: Meta 0156312450 0312581807 0156269358 Win95 Extended (0x0F) 06: Meta 0156312450 0156312450 0000000001 Extended Table (#1) 07: ----- 0156312450 0156312512 0000000063 Unallocated 08: 01:00 0156312513 0208844999 0052532487 Win95 FAT32 (0x0C) 09: 01:01 0208845000 0271498499 0062653500 DOS Extended (0x05) 10: Meta 0208845000 0208845000 0000000001 Extended Table (#2) 11: 02:00 0208845063 0271498499 0062653437 Linux (0x83) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=477889&aid=2840345&group_id=55685 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2009-08-19 14:44:46
|
Bugs item #2840345, was opened at 2009-08-19 09:42 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by carrier You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=477889&aid=2840345&group_id=55685 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Media Management Tools Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Brian Carrier (carrier) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Meta tags not consistent for DOS partitions Initial Comment: TSK 3.0 changed the way that it identified unallocated space and added the notion of META volumes. This report identifies a few issues: - Extended volumes in other extended volumes were not marked as META (but the first extended partition is) - Should we be marking the Partition Table as Unallocated (currently we do because it is not inside of an explicit partition) - Should areas inside of extended partitions be considered unallocated even though they are technically allocated to the extended partition. ------------------- From: mj...@gm... Subject: [sleuthkit-users] bug in mmls 3.01 Date: August 8, 2009 5:28:46 PM EDT To: sle...@li... On my disk. I have 3 primary and one extended partition. In the extended partition, I have multiple logical volumes. When looking at the space between logical partitions, mmls version 2.52 shows 1 sector for the partition table on one line and 62 sectors unallocated on the next line. This is normal. However, version 3.01 shows one line (meta) for the partition table, but no line for the unallocated area. Offsets look strange too (lines 10,11). Ver 2.52: 05: 00:03 0156312450 0312581807 0156269358 Win95 Extended (0x0F) 06: ----- 0156312450 0156312450 0000000001 Extended Table (#1) 07: ----- 0156312451 0156312512 0000000062 Unallocated 08: 01:00 0156312513 0208844999 0052532487 Win95 FAT32 (0x0C) 09: 01:01 0208845000 0271498499 0062653500 DOS Extended (0x05) 10: ----- 0208845000 0208845000 0000000001 Extended Table (#2) 11: ----- 0208845001 0208845062 0000000062 Unallocated ver 3.01 05: Meta 0156312450 0312581807 0156269358 Win95 Extended (0x0F) 06: Meta 0156312450 0156312450 0000000001 Extended Table (#1) 07: ----- 0156312450 0156312512 0000000063 Unallocated 08: 01:00 0156312513 0208844999 0052532487 Win95 FAT32 (0x0C) 09: 01:01 0208845000 0271498499 0062653500 DOS Extended (0x05) 10: Meta 0208845000 0208845000 0000000001 Extended Table (#2) 11: 02:00 0208845063 0271498499 0062653437 Linux (0x83) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Brian Carrier (carrier) Date: 2009-08-19 09:44 Message: Resolved first issue of extended partitions not being marked as META. Sending trunk/CHANGES.txt Sending trunk/man/mmls.1 Sending trunk/tsk3/vs/dos.c Transmitting file data ... Committed revision 105. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=477889&aid=2840345&group_id=55685 |