Re: [sleuthkit-users] Windows Precompiled EXEs

[Luís F. N. <lfc...@gm...>]

I prefer option 1, it is much more portable, you can run tsk tools from a
thumb drive in the Field for example.

Luis Nassif

Em 11 de out de 2016 18:04, "Brian Carrier" <ca...@sl...>
escreveu:

> As was mentioned in another thread, we’re looking at having The Sleuth Kit
> use a more modern Visual Studio compiler.  I need some feedback on how
> people are using the precompiled EXEs that we ship.
>
> One of the big changes is that executables now depend on a lot more
> official microsoft dlls (C runtime dlls).
>
> Historically, I’ve always tried to make it be so that you can open a ZIP
> file with the EXEs and run them with no prerequisites. We did this by
> shipping the 2 or 3 run time dlls in the same folder as the exes.
>
> With Visual Studio 2015, there are over 40 dlls, not 2!   So, there are
> two options:
>
> 1) We copy all 40+ dlls into the folder like we did before and it is now
> just a bit more work to find the exe tools in there among all of the dlls
> (they are all similarly named, which makes it somewhat easy).
>
> 2) We make the user run a Microsoft Redistributable Installer to install
> the needed dlls into the c:\windows folder if they are not already there.
> We can then ship a ZIP file and the user has to know to install the MS
> redist or we start shipping a TSK installer that also installs the MS
> redist.
>
>
> Opinions?    Do people care more about prerequisites or big folders?
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> sleuthkit-users mailing list
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sleuthkit-users
> http://www.sleuthkit.org
>