Re: [sleuthkit-users] TSK_FS_ATTR.id uniqueness bug with ext2
Brought to you by:
carrier
|
From: Jon S. <JSt...@St...> - 2016-03-29 21:03:50
|
A unique ID would be very helpful. My use case is that I'm trying to map out which ranges of the disk are associated with given (inode, attribute) pairs. Without a unique attribute ID, I can't trust that process.
When there isn't a nice organic attribute ID from the filesystem itself (as with NTFS), I'd be happy with a simple per-inode counter serving as the ID.
Jon
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian Carrier [mailto:ca...@sl...]
> Sent: Monday, March 28, 2016 9:58 PM
> To: Jon Stewart
> Cc: sleuthkit-users
> Subject: Re: [sleuthkit-users] TSK_FS_ATTR.id uniqueness bug with ext2
>
> Hey Jon,
>
> Those docs should certainly be updated. There is another comment about:
>
> #define TSK_FS_ATTR_ID_DEFAULT 0 ///< Default Data ID used if file
> system does not assign one.
>
> And TSK_FS_ATTR_ID_DEFAULT is what Ext2 is using for its ID. So, the easiest
> thing is to update the docs as you suggested. Do you have a use case where
> having an ID would be useful? It would probably not be much work to make
> that happen if it is important.
>
> thanks,
> brian
>
>
> > On Mar 28, 2016, at 3:57 PM, Jon Stewart <JSt...@St...>
> wrote:
> >
> > The docs say:
> >
> > "Each attribute has a type and an ID. The types are defined in the
> TSK_FS_ATTR_TYPE_ENUM structure and the ID is an integer that is unique
> to the file. A file can have multiple attributes with the same type, but it can
> have only one attribute with a given id."
> >
> > But I have an ext2 filesystem, some simple test evidence, where many files
> have two different attributes with id == 0. The docs also say that "TSK stores
> UFS and ExtX indirect blocks in separate attribute. [sic]" With these files
> there are type 4097 attributes, TSK_FS_ATTR_TYPE_UNIX_INDIR, so
> presumably such attributes contain the pointers for indirect blocks. It looks
> like these types of attributes also do not respect the uniqueness of attribute
> IDs.
> >
> > My guess is that the docs should be updated to reflect that attribute ID is
> unique only for given types, although it sure would be convenient to have a
> unique attribute ID regardless of type.
> >
> > Example:
> >
> > "attrs":[
> > {
> > "flags":"In Use, Non resident",
> > "id":0,
> > "name":"",
> > "size":348576,
> > "type":1,
> > "rd_buf_size":0,
> > "nrd_allocsize":352256,
> > "nrd_compsize":0,
> > "nrd_initsize":348576,
> > "nrd_skiplen":0,
> > "nrd_runs":[
> > {"addr":34009,"flags":"","len":12,"offset":0},
> > {"addr":34022,"flags":"","len":74,"offset":12},
> > {"addr":0,"flags":"Sparse","len":950,"offset":86}
> > ]
> > },
> > {
> > "flags":"In Use, Non-resident",
> > "id":0,
> > "name":"",
> > "size":4096,
> > "type":4097,
> > "rd_buf_size":0,
> > "nrd_allocsize":4096,
> > "nrd_compsize":0,
> > "nrd_initsize":4096,
> > "nrd_skiplen":0,
> > "nrd_runs":[
> > {"addr":34021,"flags":"","len":1,"offset":0}
> > ]
> > }]
> >
> >
> > Jon Stewart
> > Development Manager
> >
> > STROZ FRIEDBERG
> > 1150 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20036
> >
> > T: +1 202.534.3290
> > M: +1 202.492.4412
> > F: +1 202.534.5700
> > JSt...@St... www.strozfriedberg.com
> >
> > This message and/or its attachments may contain information that is
> confidential and/or protected by privilege from disclosure. If you have
> reason to believe you are not the intended recipient, please immediately
> notify the sender by reply e-mail or by telephone, then delete this message
> (and any attachments), as well as all copies, including any printed copies.
> Thank you.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Transform Data into Opportunity.
> > Accelerate data analysis in your applications with
> > Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library.
> > Click to learn more.
> > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785471&iu=/4140
> > _______________________________________________
> > sleuthkit-users mailing list
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sleuthkit-users
> > http://www.sleuthkit.org
|