Re: [sleuthkit-users] TSK_VS_PART_INFO slot_num & table_num questions
Brought to you by:
carrier
From: Jon S. <jo...@li...> - 2013-12-13 01:53:40
|
Gotcha'. That makes sense, thank you for clarifying. Both table_num and slot_num are -1 for the virtual "unallocated" volumes. The addr field seems to be strictly increasing across all real and virtual partitions alike. Jon On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Brian Carrier <ca...@sl...> wrote: > Hey Jon, > > Disks formatted with DOS partitions can have multiple tables. There is the primary tables and then extended tables. The table_num increments for each of those extended tables. Other more sane partitioning systems will only have one table. > > Slot number is the entry in the table. I'd need to review the code for exactly when -1 comes up. When do you see it? > > > > On Dec 11, 2013, at 3:06 PM, Jon Stewart <jo...@li...> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> In TSK_VS_PART_INFO, what is the difference between slot_num and >> table_num (or is there none)? Under what conditions could either of >> these values be equal to -1? >> >> thanks >> >> Jon >> -- >> Jon Stewart, Principal >> (646) 719-0317 | jo...@li... | Arlington, VA >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT >> organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance >> affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your >> Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro! >> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk >> _______________________________________________ >> sleuthkit-users mailing list >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sleuthkit-users >> http://www.sleuthkit.org > -- Jon Stewart, Principal (646) 719-0317 | jo...@li... | Arlington, VA |