Re: [sleuthkit-users] Multiple questions

[Joachim M. <joa...@gm...>]

> I haven't tracked the final number. Is that set by the libtool/LDFLAGS
version?

This is controlled by:
libtsk_la_LDFLAGS = -version-info 10:0:0

in: tsk/Makefile.am

> It looks good.  I'll review it later today and merge it in.
Thanks, but please revisit the code in this file I did not touch.

Also seeing the compiler warnings I expect there are signed/unsigned issues
in various more places.

> I see Jeff every day at work.  We're waiting to merge that in, but will
probably do it by end of week. In hindsight, we should probably have made a
64-bit branch instead.

Can you maybe add something to the develop guidelines about what to expect
and which email address to ping for more urgent patches?

http://wiki.sleuthkit.org/index.php?title=Developer_Guidelines





On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 5:07 AM, Brian Carrier <ca...@sl...>wrote:

> Hey Joachim,
>
> On Aug 28, 2013, at 4:57 PM, Joachim Metz wrote:
>
> > So I've just add a pull request to github, can anyone tell me what to
> expect on the response side?
>
> It looks good.  I'll review it later today and merge it in.
>
> > I see one other recent pull request of 14 days ago where it seems no one
> from the project has replied.
>
> I see Jeff every day at work.  We're waiting to merge that in, but will
> probably do it by end of week. In hindsight, we should probably have made a
> 64-bit branch instead.
>
> > Note that this pull request is supposed to fix a serious defect causing
> the current code to segfault. Also at first glance this file needs some
> serious revisiting.
> >
> >
> > Also what's up with the current so version number, why did it jump from
> 3 to 9 to 10 !? Also because the API is largely untouched?
> >
> > sleuthkit 3.x.x was soname libtsk3.3
> > sleuthkit 4.0.0 was soname libtsk3.3
> > sleuthkit 4.0.1 was soname libtsk3.9
> > sleuthkit 4.0.2 was soname libtsk3.9
> > sleuthkit 4.1.0 was soname libtsk.10
>
> I haven't tracked the final number. Is that set by the libtool/LDFLAGS
> version?
>
> > Also can someone elaborate on the sudden change of hart to rename
> libtsk3 into libtsk?
>
> Because TSK has been version 4 for almost a year and the '3' was for
> version 3. I dropped the version from the library name (and include paths).
>
> brian
>
>
>