RE: [sleuthkit-users] RE: Sleuthkit install problem
Brought to you by:
carrier
From: Chris P. <po...@na...> - 2004-05-26 12:30:53
|
Brian,=20 I issued your dls command on a 40GB NTFS partition and received no = errors. I have to admit that I am on a different machine than the one I = started with, so I will try it again at work when I can (assuming the = install works there). Chris. -----Original Message----- From: sle...@li... on behalf of Brian = Carrier Sent: Tue 5/25/2004 7:10 PM To: Angus Marshall Cc: sle...@li... Subject: Re: [sleuthkit-users] RE: Sleuthkit install problem -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On May 25, 2004, at 6:11 PM, Angus Marshall wrote: > Not sure which is the case - but here's a thought (don't scream) - if > src/makedefs is modified to change the "-DLINUX2" to read = "-DOPENBSD3", > sleuthkit seems to compile just fine. What happens when you examine a >2GB disk? The custom lseek was added=20 in TCT because the lseek with Linux did not seek beyond the 2GB limit. =20 So, I guess the test is to see if the syscall was fixed and it now=20 works for large files or that change has reverted the code back to the=20 limited version. Test it with the following: # dls -e -f FILESYSTEM /dev/hdaX > /dev/null on a large partition. thanks, brian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) iD8DBQFAs+6DOK1gLsdFTIsRAmtiAJ9AO/4nNDvRD0qFlw1VNBr+p95c3gCfVa76 FOVV9Xg4AMHBkRBFI0ASINg=3D =3DuUaL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. = Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D3149&alloc_id=3D8166&op=3Dclick _______________________________________________ sleuthkit-users mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sleuthkit-users http://www.sleuthkit.org |