Chris,
Thanks for your very informed assesment. I too would like to hear what
other knowledgable people have to say on this issue. Specifically I
wonder if it is possible to have a seperate mod_perl.deb/rpm that has
all these items enabled. Hmmm, I'm off to learn Debian packaging. ;)
Thanks again,
-Jim P.
--- Chris Nandor <pu...@po...> wrote:
> At 22:46 -0700 2001.04.12, Jim Popovitch wrote:
> >Having to recompile your webserver, just to run Slash, may have been
> >cool with version 1.0. However this is the 2.0 release, can't *we*
> do
> >what other weblogs/storyboards are capable of without recompiles of
> >standard software components? Maybe that is nirvana. But if we aim
> >for perfection we will only be that much closer.
>
> I should also add that our primary goal in Slash is to create and
> maintain
> high-performance software to run Slashdot. This is not what other
> weblogs/storyboards are capable of. :-) Many of the hooks we make
> into
> Apache/mod_perl are for performance reasons, and we won't take them
> out
> just because they are not in default installs.
>
> However, as noted a bunch of times, I don't know what hooks we use
> that the
> defaults don't. If we do find out what the problem areas are,
> specifically, then it is certainly feasible in theory to work around
> them
> for people who can't/don't want to recompile Apache. I'd really
> appreciate
> whatever specific information on this that anyone could offer.
>
> --
> Chris Nandor pu...@po...
> http://pudge.net/
> Open Source Development Network pu...@os...
> http://osdn.com/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Slashcode-general mailing list
> Sla...@li...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/slashcode-general
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
|
