From: Gaulin, M. <mg...@gl...> - 2005-03-28 19:00:10
|
Hi I'm seeing warnings about two subroutine being redefined in the = slashd.log file. The two lines are complaining about "_make_cchp_file" = and "_read_and_unlink_cchp_file", and if I search the source code, I see = those two functions defined in tasks freshenup.pl and also in = daily_archive.pl, so it certainly appears that there could be a = conflict. I also noticed that the two versions of "_make_cchp_file" are = identical, but the two "_read_and_unlink_cchp_file" methods are slightly = different (freshenup has an extra param). Should I be worried about this? I'm also seeing "Can't do setuid (cannot exec sperl)" in slashd.log. = What's that about? Thanks Mark |
From: Jamie M. <ja...@mc...> - 2005-03-28 22:08:37
|
mg...@gl... (Gaulin, Mark) writes: > Should I be worried about this? No. Just one of those little things we have to clean up. --=20 Jamie McCarthy http://mccarthy.vg/ ja...@mc... |