From: Andre-John M. <aj...@sy...> - 2008-02-22 20:18:43
|
Hi, With the constant reminder that IPv6 is on its way, I would be interested to know if anyone has tried running Slashcode on an IPv6 based Apache 2 and network? I don't imagine that there would be much in the way of issues, but I would be curious to know whether any turned up. Andre |
From: Shane Z. <sh...@lo...> - 2008-02-25 23:25:58
|
On Feb 22, 2008, at 3:18 PM, Andre-John Mas wrote: > Hi, > > With the constant reminder that IPv6 is on its way, I would be > interested to know if anyone has tried running Slashcode on an IPv6 > based Apache 2 and network? I don't imagine that there would be much > in the way of issues, but I would be curious to know whether any > turned up. Well seeing as Slash doesn't run under Apache 2 yet (see 'INSTALL' file for more info I think it's in there) I'd say no :( |
From: Andre-John M. <aj...@sy...> - 2008-02-26 00:10:04
|
On 25-Feb-08, at 18:25 , Shane Zatezalo wrote: > > On Feb 22, 2008, at 3:18 PM, Andre-John Mas wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> With the constant reminder that IPv6 is on its way, I would be >> interested to know if anyone has tried running Slashcode on an IPv6 >> based Apache 2 and network? I don't imagine that there would be much >> in the way of issues, but I would be curious to know whether any >> turned up. > > > Well seeing as Slash doesn't run under Apache 2 yet (see 'INSTALL' > file for more info I think it's in there) I'd say no :( I didn't see anything about Apache 2 not being support in the documents. All I see are the minimum supported versions. Doing a search of the internet shows compatibility issues, but the posts generally date 2004 and before. Is there a list of outstanding issues, with regards to Apache 2 and Slashcode? Andre |
From: Shane Z. <sh...@lo...> - 2008-02-26 14:22:07
|
On Feb 25, 2008, at 7:09 PM, Andre-John Mas wrote: > > On 25-Feb-08, at 18:25 , Shane Zatezalo wrote: > >> >> On Feb 22, 2008, at 3:18 PM, Andre-John Mas wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> With the constant reminder that IPv6 is on its way, I would be >>> interested to know if anyone has tried running Slashcode on an IPv6 >>> based Apache 2 and network? I don't imagine that there would be much >>> in the way of issues, but I would be curious to know whether any >>> turned up. >> >> >> Well seeing as Slash doesn't run under Apache 2 yet (see 'INSTALL' >> file for more info I think it's in there) I'd say no :( > > I didn't see anything about Apache 2 not being support in the > documents. > All I see are the minimum supported versions. Doing a search of the > internet shows compatibility issues, but the posts generally date 2004 > and before. > cooliod:current.untouched shane$ pwd /Users/shane/src/slash/current.untouched cooliod:current.untouched shane$ grep -ie 'Apache 2' * INSTALL: not compatible with Apache 2.x and we have no plans to port to 2.x :) > Is there a list of outstanding issues, with regards to Apache 2 and > Slashcode? That I don't know about. Maybe one of the OSTG guys will pipe in. I think there might have been an article on slashcode.com about it at one point or another. If memory serves, someone had started the modifications to make it work under Apache 2, or had got it working. I think at that time, modperl2 wasn't done yet. But if either happened, I don't recall ever seeing a patch submitted to Slash's sourceforge homepage with the needed changes. I could be wrong. I'd check the bugs-list, patch list and feature request list on the sf homepage. A subject change of Apache 2 and modperl 2 might be in order for the thread. That may get it more attention. I nearly ignored it because we, here, have no interest wrt IPv6. Hope that helps. Shane |
From: Cristian F. <cri...@gm...> - 2008-02-26 20:59:21
|
Fucking lame (stone age hippies)! Maybe we should have left linux at version 2.0. That should be enough for you, right? If you don't need it nobody does. If you make use of something free, give something back you 4chan-ers. Don't obfuscated it under the pile of garbage that is the slashdot code. NO security updates. NO fucking nothing: no help, no themes, no updates. But, of course, you expect respect for what you do, sure. Please, make something useful, you bunch of hypocritical hippies, from what you take from others. On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Shane Zatezalo <sh...@lo...> wrote: > > On Feb 25, 2008, at 7:09 PM, Andre-John Mas wrote: > > > > > On 25-Feb-08, at 18:25 , Shane Zatezalo wrote: > > > >> > >> On Feb 22, 2008, at 3:18 PM, Andre-John Mas wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> With the constant reminder that IPv6 is on its way, I would be > >>> interested to know if anyone has tried running Slashcode on an IPv6 > >>> based Apache 2 and network? I don't imagine that there would be much > >>> in the way of issues, but I would be curious to know whether any > >>> turned up. > >> > >> > >> Well seeing as Slash doesn't run under Apache 2 yet (see 'INSTALL' > >> file for more info I think it's in there) I'd say no :( > > > > I didn't see anything about Apache 2 not being support in the > > documents. > > All I see are the minimum supported versions. Doing a search of the > > internet shows compatibility issues, but the posts generally date 2004 > > and before. > > > > cooliod:current.untouched shane$ pwd > /Users/shane/src/slash/current.untouched > cooliod:current.untouched shane$ grep -ie 'Apache 2' * > INSTALL: not compatible with Apache 2.x and we have no plans to > port to 2.x > > :) > > > > Is there a list of outstanding issues, with regards to Apache 2 and > > Slashcode? > > That I don't know about. Maybe one of the OSTG guys will pipe in. I > think there might have been an article on slashcode.com about it at > one point or another. If memory serves, someone had started the > modifications to make it work under Apache 2, or had got it working. I > think at that time, modperl2 wasn't done yet. But if either happened, > I don't recall ever seeing a patch submitted to Slash's sourceforge > homepage with the needed changes. > > I could be wrong. I'd check the bugs-list, patch list and feature > request list on the sf homepage. > > A subject change of Apache 2 and modperl 2 might be in order for the > thread. That may get it more attention. I nearly ignored it because > we, here, have no interest wrt IPv6. > > Hope that helps. > > Shane > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Slashcode-general mailing list > Sla...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/slashcode-general > |