From: Brent M. <br...@me...> - 2001-07-25 18:43:55
|
The new slash 2.0 doesn't archive stories into .shtml, so are old stories lost FOREVER? I don't understand. Ever since I upgrade from 1.0 to 2.0, stories on my site are dropping like flys. This can't possibly be true!? --Brent |
From: Brian A. <br...@ta...> - 2001-07-25 18:59:01
|
Brent Meshier wrote: > > The new slash 2.0 doesn't archive stories into .shtml, so are old stories > lost FOREVER? I don't understand. Ever since I upgrade from 1.0 to 2.0, > stories on my site are dropping like flys. This can't possibly be true!? They just stay in the database. I'm not sure why you stories would be going away. -Brian -- _______________________________________________________ Brian Aker, br...@ta... Slashdot Senior Developer Seattle, Washington http://tangent.org/~brian/ http://slashdot.org/ _______________________________________________________ You can't grep a dead tree. |
From: Eric D. <eri...@ja...> - 2001-07-25 19:01:58
|
I think there is a script in the utils directory that will convert old slash 1.0.x .shtml files back to stories in the database Brent Meshier wrote: > The new slash 2.0 doesn't archive stories into .shtml, so are old stories > lost FOREVER? I don't understand. Ever since I upgrade from 1.0 to 2.0, > stories on my site are dropping like flys. This can't possibly be true!? > > --Brent > > _______________________________________________ > Slashcode-general mailing list > Sla...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/slashcode-general -- What we have to learn to do, we learn by doing. - Aristotle Eric Dannewitz - Adventurer, saxophonist, good-timer (crook? quite possibly), clarinetist, manic self-publicist, part-time flautist(flutist?), macintosher, and often thought to be completely out to lunch. http://www.jazz-sax.com |
From: Brent M. <br...@me...> - 2001-07-25 19:20:05
|
I found the slashdearchive tool, but im waiting to hear from someone on the list on its proper usage. I have two years of stories that need stuffed back into the database. The usage is confusing, can someone give me an example? -----Original Message----- From: sla...@li... [mailto:sla...@li...]On Behalf Of Eric Dannewitz Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 2:02 PM To: sla...@li... Subject: Re: [Slashcode-general] slash 2.0 I think there is a script in the utils directory that will convert old slash 1.0.x .shtml files back to stories in the database Brent Meshier wrote: > The new slash 2.0 doesn't archive stories into .shtml, so are old stories > lost FOREVER? I don't understand. Ever since I upgrade from 1.0 to 2.0, > stories on my site are dropping like flys. This can't possibly be true!? > > --Brent > > _______________________________________________ > Slashcode-general mailing list > Sla...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/slashcode-general -- What we have to learn to do, we learn by doing. - Aristotle Eric Dannewitz - Adventurer, saxophonist, good-timer (crook? quite possibly), clarinetist, manic self-publicist, part-time flautist(flutist?), macintosher, and often thought to be completely out to lunch. http://www.jazz-sax.com _______________________________________________ Slashcode-general mailing list Sla...@li... http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/slashcode-general |