From: <sla...@bo...> - 2003-02-04 17:25:27
|
Michael Mahrle wrote: > What's also worthwhile mentioning is that I am basically running the > identical setup of what you got over there. RH73, same slash, same apache, > same perl, etc.. So whatever you find - please please please share with me - > I will do the same of course. Yes, I think that's no coincidence. Is there anyone else who's running this setup, or are there known problems with it? > RedHat 7.3 base > Slash 2.2.6 > perl-5.6.1-34.99.6 > mod_perl-1.26-5 > apache-1.3.27-2 > mysql-3.23.54a-3.72 > perl-DBI-1.21-1 Thanks, Brian Del Vecchio MSNews: http://msnews.bostoncure.org/ |
From: Michael M. <mi...@da...> - 2003-02-04 21:25:16
|
Okay, try to put this in your crontab: 0,30 * * * * /etc/init.d/slash keepalive I just put it in - let me know if it works for you. Michael ----- Original Message ----- From: <sla...@bo...> To: "Michael Mehrle" <mi...@da...> Cc: <sla...@li...> Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 9:26 AM Subject: Re: [Slashcode-general] Help: stuck processes > > Michael Mahrle wrote: > > What's also worthwhile mentioning is that I am basically running the > > identical setup of what you got over there. RH73, same slash, same apache, > > same perl, etc.. So whatever you find - please please please share with me - > > I will do the same of course. > > Yes, I think that's no coincidence. > > Is there anyone else who's running this setup, or are there > known problems with it? > > > RedHat 7.3 base > > Slash 2.2.6 > > perl-5.6.1-34.99.6 > > mod_perl-1.26-5 > > apache-1.3.27-2 > > mysql-3.23.54a-3.72 > > perl-DBI-1.21-1 > > Thanks, > > Brian Del Vecchio > MSNews: http://msnews.bostoncure.org/ > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.NET email is sponsored by: > SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! > http://www.vasoftware.com > _______________________________________________ > Slashcode-general mailing list > Sla...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/slashcode-general |
From: shane <sh...@lo...> - 2003-02-05 20:20:30
|
On Tuesday 04 February 2003 12:26, sla...@bo... wrote: > Michael Mahrle wrote: > > What's also worthwhile mentioning is that I am basically running the > > identical setup of what you got over there. RH73, same slash, same > > apache, same perl, etc.. So whatever you find - please please please > > share with me - I will do the same of course. > > Yes, I think that's no coincidence. > > Is there anyone else who's running this setup, or are there > known problems with it? > > > RedHat 7.3 base > > Slash 2.2.6 > > perl-5.6.1-34.99.6 > > mod_perl-1.26-5 > > apache-1.3.27-2 > > mysql-3.23.54a-3.72 > > perl-DBI-1.21-1 > > Thanks, > > Brian Del Vecchio > MSNews: http://msnews.bostoncure.org/ I've had slash running on just about every version of Redhat since 7.0. My production box is still RH7.1, however. My main test box is also 7.1 (built virtually identically). My 2nd test box was RH7.3 until recently, it's now 8.0. It's been the box that's had each and every iteration of RH on it, as well as many different versions of slash, and other software, on it over and over again. I've never had any of the problems you seem to be having. On the RH7.1 prod box: perl v5.6.1 apache 1.3.26 slash 2.3 (upgraded a week ago, it had been 2.2.6 since fry had come out) mod_perl 1.27 mysql Ver 11.13 Distrib 3.23.36, for pc-linux-gnu (i686) perl and apache installed from tarball on all redhat machines <8.0. mySQL is from the RPMs. Hope that helps... Shane |