|
From: Alvaro d. C. <ac...@ba...> - 2001-04-21 08:26:23
|
On 20 Apr 2001 10:25:33 -0700, Eric Dannewitz wrote: > Well, why don't you host the sites for them? You can charge them like whatever, > or not charge them, and then they can run a site, they have YOU as the admin (a > person they know), and everyone is happy. We have done it for two projects. We hope in the future to put banners in their sites and obtain a % of their money ;-) For them now it hasn't any cost until they see that it can be a bussiness for them. The cost for us is minimal. When you have slashcode 2.0 installed in your system, hosting a new slashsite is trivial. You add a new virtual user for DBIx:Passowrd , execute /usr/local/slash/bin/install-slashsite and include in httpd.conf the new Virtual Host as said in the file automatically generated by install-slashsite. There are two kinds of people: we, the technicians and the people who have the content for the slashsite. The last can't install slashcode but this is normal I think. Cheers -- Alvaro > > Morbus Iff wrote: > > > > I would suggest you really look into a Slashhosting service. Your goal > > > I imagine is to get your site up and running, not become a perl > > > hacker. Going with a hosting service is your best option. The will > > > have it installed correctly, they will make sure your site is backed > > > up, and you will just have to worry about content (which is in the > > > end the most difficult piece to the puzzle). > > > > Actually, I am a perl hacker ;) [my main project is > > disobey.com/amphetadesk/] ... I just have a hard-on for global accessibility > > and user friendliness. I run the servers that my sites are hosted on, I have > > no problem installing Slashcode on there. > > > > For *me*, Slashcode is fine, perfect, and easily do-able. I have no > > convictions when I think about a Narcissistic reality. I, however, know a > > bunch of people who would love to use Slashcode as a solution to their > > needs. They, on the other hand, are not geeks. And their hosting providers > > are not friendly (rather generic, as it were). Slashcode would never work > > for them. > > > > And changing a hosting provider, while generic and without a face, may be > > the "proper" solution to getting Slashcode up and running for these people, > > it's not a viable one. Have you ever changed houses because you're sick and > > tired of taking the subway every morning? Even if your house is perfect and > > without complaint? > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Slashcode-general mailing list > > Sla...@li... > > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/slashcode-general > > -- > Back up my hard disk? I can't find the reverse switch! > > Eric Dannewitz - Adventurer, saxophonist, good-timer (crook? quite possibly), > clarinetist, manic self-publicist, part-time flautist(flutist?), macintosher, > and often thought to be completely out to lunch. http://www.jazz-sax.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > Slashcode-general mailing list > Sla...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/slashcode-general > |