Re: [Slashcode-general] (Bender) Apache won't start

[Alvaro d. C. <ac...@ba...>]

Hi!

I am using Debian Potato with some extra Perl modules installed in it.
But talking about de web server, I have installed the Apache server
with mod_perl that is included in Debian and it works right.

More details:

ii  apache-common  1.3.9-13.1     Support files for all Apache
webservers
ii  apache-dev     1.3.9-13.1     Apache webserver development kit
ii  apache-perl    1.3.9-13.1-1.2 Versatile, high-performance HTTP
server with
ii  libapache-dbi- 0.87-1         Connect apache server to database via
perl's
ii  libapache-dbil 0.93-1         Tracks what's being transferred in a
DBI dat

With Debian you can have slashcode working without compiling Apache
and mod_perl.

Cheers

-- Alvaro


On 12 Apr 2001 22:46:08 -0700, Jim Popovitch wrote:
> Chris, The whole INSTALL.debian file suggests that one can install
> Debian packages rather than having to build things according to the
> INSTALL file.  Is there a definitive agreement on whether or not this
> is true?  If not, why have that file in the distro?  If pieces of the
> file are false, why leave them in the file?  Maybe you are not the
> person who handles this.  Is there someone else who puts the
> distribution together?
> 
> As for the mod_perl differences, maybe you can't speak to their need. 
> Is there possibly someone with more insight, who is deeply involved
> with Slash, that could possibly explain *why* these differences are
> needed.  I.E. which specific part of Slash requires PERL_MARK_WHERE=1
> or EVERYTHING=1
> 
> Having to recompile your webserver, just to run Slash, may have been
> cool with version 1.0.  However this is the 2.0 release, can't *we* do
> what other weblogs/storyboards are capable of without recompiles of
> standard software components?  Maybe that is nirvana.  But if we aim
> for perfection we will only be that much closer.
> 
> -Jim P.
> 
> --- Chris Nandor <pu...@po...> wrote:
> > At 18:18 -0700 2001.04.12, Jim Popovitch wrote:
> > >I guess you aren't familiar with the INSTALL.debian file that ships
> > >with the Slash-2.0.0-pre1 source distribution.  Let me identify the
> > >incorrect parts:
> > 
> > You put in the whole file.  I don't think the whole file is
> > incorrect.
> > Please say which parts are in correct, and how they are incorrect. 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> > 
> > At 18:34 -0700 2001.04.12, Jim Popovitch wrote:
> > >Can yourself, or someone else, please explain the necessity of
> > having
> > >to build mod_perl as outlined in the INSTALL.
> > 
> > The options listed that are listed as passed to mod_perl for the
> > build are
> > not in most default mod_perl configurations.
> > 
> > 
> > >What, if anything,
> > >can be done to overcome these issues so that installation is more
> > >streamlined?
> > 
> > As far as I know, nothing can be done in Slash to change it.  One
> > would
> > have to get the various distributions to change their configuration
> > options.
> > 
> > -- 
> > Chris Nandor                      pu...@po...   
> > http://pudge.net/
> > Open Source Development Network    pu...@os...    
> > http://osdn.com/
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Slashcode-general mailing list
> > Sla...@li...
> > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/slashcode-general
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. 
> http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Slashcode-general mailing list
> Sla...@li...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/slashcode-general
>