From: Eric D. <eri...@ja...> - 2011-02-04 05:06:27
|
There are some moderation plugins for wordpress Sent from my iSomething On Feb 3, 2011, at 6:45 PM, A H <hol...@gm...> wrote: > And can Wordpress do moderation points like Slash? > > The moderation system was what attracted me to Slash but I had to give > up on it - too many undocumented "features". > > I think it's still a relevant format and I would love to see it > flourish. My contribution would need to be in documentation because I > am not a programmer. > > -Andrew > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 8:39 PM, Eric Dannewitz <eri...@ja...> wrote: >> I'd ditch slash for wordpress. I did and have never regretted it >> >> Sent from my iSomething >> >> On Feb 3, 2011, at 4:23 PM, George Taft <geo...@gm...> wrote: >> >>> An Open Letter to the Developers of Slashdot, and What's Left of the >>> Slashcode Community -- >>> >>> I'm an avid reader of Slashdot. I don't comment much, but I've always >>> been impressed by Slashdot's moderation system. It manages what should >>> be an unmanageable task: ensuring a civil discussion among thousands >>> and thousands of users. >>> >>> I've come into a situation where I now need a system much like >>> Slashdot's: an extensible and scalable readership-moderated online >>> discussion forum. Lo and behold, Slashdot make Slash open source years >>> ago. They even got an O'Reilly book. >>> >>> But Slashcode was never the priority of the coders. The last official >>> release is, what, nine years old? There's been much more modern code >>> released, but even that's a couple of years old. What little traces I >>> can find of other sites using Slash involve those sites migrating to >>> something else. This message is evidently the first post on >>> slashcode-general in almost a year. The coders have written that >>> management of the open-source branch of the codebase is still not >>> their priority. And so the userbase has almost disappeared, like so >>> many Mac clones. >>> >>> Over the past three months, I've tried to install Slash myself, and I >>> run into the sorts of problems that are documented elsewhere. I relied >>> on the woefully out-of-date alternate install document at >>> misterorange.com. And I still don't know: am I using the right >>> distro...is there a best distro? Is this version of Perl too new? This >>> version of MySQL or Apache? Why is this thing not working...and why is >>> it so hard to make work? The friend who's been helping me through this >>> process has constantly grumbled about the suite's age, its reliance on >>> aged platforms, and wouldn't I like to try something more modern? >>> >>> Nevertheless, no one can name me a CMS that does as good or better a >>> job of moderation. (I desperately wish someone could, because I'd be >>> pleased to go use that.) The coders have given their reasoning for why >>> they still use Perl and Apache 1.3: because they still work. Slashdot >>> is living proof that Slashcode works. I buy their logic. >>> >>> I believe so strongly in its value as a discussion-moderating tool >>> that I'm pledging to volunteer time to revive the Slashcode project. >>> I'm asking for help from whoever will give it. >>> >>> I'm at best a feral coder. (I found a bug in installing 2.52 the other >>> night, a typo that screws up the install at the creation of the >>> "Preview" table. I was able to fix it and get the whole install done, >>> but it took forever and it only half-works.) But I know what good user >>> interface design looks like, and I'm an excellent writer and >>> documenter. I'd like at least to help make the installation more >>> user-friendly. >>> >>> Perhaps it's naive of me to think that this email will make something >>> happen. But if you have even a smidgen of interest in making Slash >>> accessible to a slightly more general audience, please, please post >>> here. Let's begin this project anew. >>> >>> == George >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> The modern datacenter depends on network connectivity to access resources >>> and provide services. The best practices for maximizing a physical server's >>> connectivity to a physical network are well understood - see how these >>> rules translate into the virtual world? >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnlfb >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Slashcode-general mailing list >>> Sla...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/slashcode-general >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> The modern datacenter depends on network connectivity to access resources >> and provide services. The best practices for maximizing a physical server's >> connectivity to a physical network are well understood - see how these >> rules translate into the virtual world? >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnlfb >> _______________________________________________ >> Slashcode-general mailing list >> Sla...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/slashcode-general >> > > > > -- > > -Andrew Holden > cell/text: 610-212-3466 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > The modern datacenter depends on network connectivity to access resources > and provide services. The best practices for maximizing a physical server's > connectivity to a physical network are well understood - see how these > rules translate into the virtual world? > http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnlfb > _______________________________________________ > Slashcode-general mailing list > Sla...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/slashcode-general |